that's pure emotions, john, no logic at all. john: just to be clear, when you say believe in climate change. i believe in climate change too, climate changes, do you believe it's a catastrophe. >> theres are those who think the world is coming to an end, i don't think the evidence supports that. when you make the projections out a century or two. the air margins are too wide. john: cover that later in the show. thank you, michael shermer. i want to believe that people in business are rational because money's at stake. if you're hiring someone, you want to make sure the new employee is competent, but turns out that job recruiters are not rational about that. once in abc days i sent pairs of actors out to apply for the same job. exact same resume, told them to say roughly the same things, and they did. there was only one difference between the two people. one was especially good looking. the other was not. before we sent them out, we had a makeup artist increase the difference. she touched up the lookers and others added blemishes

president says, no, we insist that money goes to this organization after what we have seen, that has no logic. journalist: if republican leaders on capitol hill, as you say, repeat that message over and over. if the democrats any white house say absolutely we need federal funding to planned parenthood and they veto or threatened to veto bills and the government is shutdown, do you think in a situation the public would back republicans in that fight? they have not backed republicans in prior fights. guest: i don't know. i don't know that you know. we can look at history and i get that. i've seen the polling numbers in the past. i would argue that i don't believe we have made the argument in a compelling and articulate -- and frankly, not enough. that has to happen. i think there is a simple moral question that every member with a conscience -- are you going to allow the tax dollars of the families you get the privilege of serving and representing, are you going to continue to allow those dollars to go to an organization now known to have engaged in what they did? i, personally, cannot do that.

. >> no logic, a bunch of false prophets, pushing a poisonous product. >> i'm not hard to find.y the gorilla cage. holler at me, baby, hoo, hoo. watch it. ♪ [ dog barking ] ♪ >> first, t. call himself an emcee. he and grandmaster flash wrote and recorded "the message." an album that was a complete groundbreaking departure from the kind of lyrics and content up to that point. >> before we started doing hip-hop music there was no hip-hop, so we played everything. disco reggae, rock, watched heehaw. that was like a favorite in our house. "hee-haw." and all of those things kind of became the components of what became hip-hop music. ♪ to the burnin' sand ♪ here i stand ♪ the weapon in my hand is a mic in my hand ♪ >> i started out as a break dancer. i used to break dance. my brother used to do graffiti. in all of those individual elements, it wasn't really happening anywhere else. so it was just something that could only have went on right in that area. >> okay. you may be thinking about what about the sugar hill gang? what about them? they were an industry band like the monkeys or t

there is no logical reason. i can tell you that a great number of the people were opposed were with men and explanations that i have read about women in particular of of closing its the roles. they sounded the worst of a chauvinistic mass. we have our places and it isn't a good 88 to confuse the roles. that is the general idea behind it. but this is coming from women and certainly man. >> the 18th and 19th amendment of the one hand to oppose suffrage those that were the most die-hard activist, you had of lot of prominent leaders who seemed to be making deals that were very active and the temperance movement and supportive of the 18th amendment as well. do you talk about that in the book the political bargaining that seemed to be going on to get most -- both the of the of men? rick i have written that linked in another book and it is my feeling that it was but i don't think that had much to do with the basic problems of the 1920's. >> could you talk about the harlem renaissance and the state of race relations its

many of whom are in for minor offenses or because they are mentally ill or for not any good p no logical reason. in california, through our lawsuit and hunger strikes, they realize this is a wrongheaded policy, even from the perspective of good prison management, apart from the human rights problem. in addition, california has recognized for people who are in solitary confinement for a very long time, it is cruel and inhumane. to put somebody in a small little box with no windows, no phone calls, no ability to contact other people -- they could get written up and discipline for even communicating with other prisoners -- it is just an inhumane way to run a prison. and for everybody who is there for more than 10 years, they're going to get them out of solitary confinement. in fact, they're going to go through all of the prisoners who are there simply for gang affiliation. and if they don't have a serious misconduct in two years -- in the last two years, they're going to put them into general population. california estimates that over 95% of all the prisoners they have there now for simply

there's no logic to their work flow. it's totally inefficient. the facility feels really hot, and it's messy. that's not a good thing for the people that do the work. and it's also not good for the furniture. dust and heat -- that's not something you want around fine furniture. steve: all of these products -- these are orders to be done. lemonis: it's not very clear what the process is. it's not easy to follow. louis: it is for me, 'cause i've been doing it for so long. and that's why i have stevie to help me. lemonis: and so are you training him to be a foreman? louis: yeah, to get to that point. lemonis: why isn't he at that point yet? steven: i'm not comfortable, because i'm not sure that this is the actual order, because something changes, and it's all these two when they talk to clients, and then it stays in their heads. lemonis: for the last 14 years, steven and louis have been running this business with a secret sort of code where they just know what's going on. the problem is nobody else does, including stevie, who's ultimately one day su

there is no logical reason for it.i can tell you a great number of the people who opposed suffrage were women. explanations that i have read about women in particular opposing suffrage had to do with their roles. they sounded like the worst of's chauvinistic men that it is not our place to be in the voting booth. we have our places, our men have their places. this is not a good idea, i don't think they would've used a term like this that it's not a good idea to confuse the roles. that was the general idea behind it. again this is coming from women it's really from men. >> follow-up question. on the 18th and 19th amendment. on one hand you had a lot of women who opposed suffrage but among women who are the most diehard activist for suffrage, you had prominent leaders who seem to be making deals who are very active in the movement of very supportive of the 18th amendment as well. would you you talk about that in the book. the political bargaining that seem to be going on between the two groups to get both those amendment

think about that there is absolutely no logic there is no good policy in recent. so every legitimate report those done by special interest by profit margins still issues something about consumer prices that they will stay says blood dash stable or declined. it is good for energy security. wiedmaier say that? if you are officially controlled of market what will happen? the investment goes someplace else unless day fishtail revolution is not restricted you know, it is everywhere in rainouts we have access to the technology one so to continue the revolution in our country, recently tony blair talked to talk about stabilizing the world said the one thing we need to do is have energy security. think about what we can do for national security. we have national security and global security and consumers who are benefited and american jobs and workers so explain to be the downside. why we have the policy continuing and i will tell you right now fear of the unknown i will be blamed if prices are increased even though that is irrational ideology anything that will upset the

there is absolutely no logic to not lifting this ban. there's no good public policy reason for not lifting the ban. so let's start out with consumers. every legitimate report, every led legitimate report, not reports done by special interests, every legitimate report tells you one thing about consumer prices, either they will stay stable or decline in this country as a result of exports. so this is good for consumers. it's good for jobs. it's good for energy security. why do i say that? because if you are artificially control the market, if you restrict the access to market, what's going to happen to the investment? what is the investment go? it goes someplace else. it's not going to stay in the united states of america. the shale revolution isn't restricted. if you've looked at the maps, you know that shale oil is everywhere. and that we have right now the access to the technology. we're getting more and more efficient, in my state more efficient in the industry, and we can be the lowest cost producer of shale oil. we have to have access

there is absolutely no logic in that. eason for not lifting the ban. let's start out with consumers. every legitimate report, every legitimate report, not reports done by special-interest that are obviously experiencing some pretty impressive profit margins, every legitimate report tells you one thing about consumer prices. eve or -- they will decline in this country so this is good for jobs. it's good for energy security. why do i say that? if you artificially control the market, if you restrict the access to the market was going to happen to the investment? where does the investment go? it go someplace else. it's not going to stay united states of america. the shale revolution is a restricted. if you look at the maps you know the shale oil is everywhere and that we have right now the access to the technology. we are getting more efficient and in my state more efficient in the industry and we know we need the lowest cost of shale. that energy self-sufficiency. i was recently at the mccain institute where tony blair talked

no logical thought at all in their process. they're worried about jihaddists when a nuclear bomb if we don't do this deal and it's a very good possibility, would kill a lot more people. say give the plan a chance. host: another view from pittsburgh here, mary ann on the republicans line. caller:: i'm against the deal. i don't believe iran would do anything to help us at all. i think the previous call wirs completely wrong about going to war. host: thomas in arizona, independents line. what do you think about the debate in congress over this deal? caller: actually, i'm from arkansas. host: i'm sorry, arkansas. go ahead. caller: ok. i think that if they can enforce this new treaty that you'll see things happen in this nation that make katrina look like nothing, that make sandy look like nothing. that makes your wildfire look like nothing. i think that every house in this nation will be destroyed. i think that your lands will be destroyed and your trees will be destroyed. i think your businesses will be destroyed and it will be go

has a broader base of decision making that is private-sector led, including input from the tech no logical society, et cetera. but that's advice that informs the policy and the board activities that are anchored in the fact that governments are continuing to play an advisory role to what we do. >> tonight at 8:00 eastern and pacific on "the communicators" on c-span2. >>> coming up next, panelists from government and federal agencies discuss access to information and the implications of the data act on the executive branch. this is hosted by the dated transparency coalition here in washington, d.c. it's about 50 minutes. >>> good morning. welcome back from the break, everyone. it's great to be here with you all. my name is bryce pickert and a principal with boon hamilton for federal clients. i'm very pleased to be introducing and moderating this panel on the future of data and the executive branch. we heard earlier from daryl isa that if laws are not implemented and enforced they are meaningless. and that implementation often requires very hard work. the data act requires the publishing of

. >> guest: milton friedman is brilliant and lawsuit -- logical mind and no mel -- nobel laureate economist but this book my newest book which is a sharp book is called the 21st century case for dole the new information theory of money which has been adopted by people like conservative magazine has adopted it and it prevails in the world economy and it has resulted in a currency market that transacts $5.4 trillion worth of kurianzi every 24 hours that's 100 times all the transactions and all the stock markets in the world put together. it's 25 times all the goods and services around the world put together. and yet it's purpose which is to define a value for money and every country around the world failed because as a measuring stick the currency values are more volatile. they change more rapidly than the economic activity it is supposed to measure so that currency trading, $5.4 trillion a day in currency trading is an utter failure and it's based on milton friedman's belief that currency should flow which has been adopted by liberal eagerly and is really a foundation for monetary policy aro

no direct evidence. but an sent any other logical conclusion when there is no direct motive, no connection between officer and the suspect, that never crossed paths. and you're drawing conclusions. >> in new york city we saw two cops executed in the week of the ferguson situation. and the killer attributed it to the situation with michael brown who we now know was killed while he was attack a police officer. the morning before he killed those cops he tweeted out, pigs in a bland frying like bacon. a reference to dead cops. then we see that happen the day after your deputy gets shot and killed. do you think this argument, that rhetoric is really meaningless and we don't need to worry about it holds water? >> no i don't. i think when you say, inflammatory things that people take to heart. there are people susceptible enough to act on that. and that language should be held accountable. >> what is the status tonight of the family that of the slain officer? >> well obviously, the family is very fragile. it has been just over 48 hours since this happened. the wife is an extremely strong woman. yet she is facing

no sense. where's the logic behind it if it's weak, why would you use it? >> by all accounts what's driving the changes in hiring of air traffic controllers is a program to promote diversity in the nation's control towers. >> diversity is a noble goal. i'm not going to deny that. >> it generate a better atmosphere when you have people from different back grounds and i completely agree with it. >> back in 2013. the faa office of civil rights published a massive barrier analysis on the impediments or barriers for minorities. it states the first steps of the original hiring process are the most likely places for systematic adverse impacts. because these steps are responsible for the vast majority of fails. it also says the cti program is much less diverse than off-the-street hires. >> the barrier analysis concluded that you're not diverse. >> we had completed a diversity study. which showed that we were showing significant progress in helping the diversity within the faa air traffic controller ranks. >> lucas, are you african-american? >> yeah. >> they threw y

. >> there is no other logical explanation as to how a flaperon could be in that part of the world in the ocean and it is apparent it's been floating for some period of time for all the balernacle growth. >> reporter: caught amid this, the relatives of the 239 people on board. still grieving, more than 17 months on. still uncertain as the world waits for conclusive proof. and this morning a spokesman for the families of the chinese passengers on board has told nbc news he's surprised and confused by delays to the investigation and the mixed messages after so long. but remember, savannah, the debris is from a 777. only one of those is missing. and investigators from all countries have little or no ubt it is from mh-370. >> the families really want the clariti clarity. bill, thank you so much. willie? >> they say there is no such thing as bad press and apparently that rings true for the controversial extramarital dating website aveshley madison. stephanie gosk has an update. good morning. >> hey, willie. experts and analysts predicted the hack would be the end of ashley madison. but the

so the government isn't going to hand over that information and the logical conclusion is that no oneue. one of the opinions that the circuit issued today was written by janice brown, probably the most libertarian judge on the branch. and in order to prove that they are allowed to sue, they would have to get the kind of evidence that is already being kept secret because of the program and that's just the way that the secrecy rules are working and there's nothing that the court can do about that. kennedy: by the nature of the way that the courts are set up for fisa, even if they change the nature and structure of that, it, at least until november thanks to executive decree. how are you ever going to be able to prove something that is completely at opaque and hidden from view. i don't understand it. but what i want to know is who does this gray area benefit? >> ultimately benefits the government and that the reason why many legal scholars have criticized this standing doctrine the matter what the law is. because the federal courts are supposed to be open for people to bring their compla

we need the brits and the chinese and the russians or there ain't going to be no boycotts or sanctions. that's logical. they'll buy the same stuff from somebody else. why don't people hear that in your party? >> i'm saying it, chris, and you're hearing it. i mean, am i the only one? look, i just think that, first of all, i think a lot of it is i was there for 18 years on that defense committee, and your old boss, tip o'neal, created the space to put me on the committee. working with gary hart and barry goldwater, you learn a lot about how the world works from the great minds of defense. i learned a lot then. i know it matters that we have good allies. that's how we won world war ii. >> everybody out tonight, it reminds me, politics does, of an middle eastern suk saying everybody is working their own stalls. rubio was trying to prove to the rest of the daddy war bucks how height wing he is. carly fiorina was getting even with trump. and huckabee is reading his religious right. what is your constituency? who are your people? >> i'm not worried about standing out. i'm going to just tell people what my ex

if you follow that argument to the logical conclusion, you will end up doing nothing and holding no one accountable. what other atrocities and gay rights, black slavery, you cannot include every human rights violation when you remember certain crime against humanity. when you talk about gay rights, you focused about gay rights. when you talk about this resolution, you're you focus on japan's atrocity to what's 200,000 women. it is not all about the citizens of the world. the argument that this resolution will hurt japanese americans is simply wrong, wrong. japanese americans have done nothing to deserve such a association. japan did what japan did as a foreign government. japanese-americans were victims. they should not be associated with that and we will fight against hate crimes against japanese-americans because of this resolution. we are a multiethnic rights collaboration including many japanese americans like all americans, many japanese-americans want to hold japan accountable for its crimes against humanity. she said, my father went to jail because of the association -- >> thank

if you follow that argument to the logical conclusion, you will end up doing nothing and holding no one accountable. what other atrocities and gay rights, black slavery, you cannot include every human rights violation when you remember certain crime against humanity. when you talk about gay rights, you focused about gay rights. when you talk about this resolution, you're you focus on japan's atrocity to what's 200,000 women. it is not all about the citizens of the world. the argument that this resolution will hurt japanese americans is simply wrong, wrong. japanese americans have done nothing to deserve such a association. japan did what japan did as a foreign government. japanese-americans were victims. they should not be associated with that and we will fight against hate crimes against japanese-americans because of this resolution. we are a multiethnic rights collaboration including many japanese americans like all americans, many japanese-americans want to hold japan accountable for its crimes against humanity. she said, my father went to jail because of the association -- >> thank

the sort of scooby do logic of birthers that somehow they figured out that barack obama snuck in but none else has that's been the thing he's been playing for years. >> can you repeat that for me, jason? i couldn't hear it. >> the scooby do logic of birthers they somehow figured out that barack obama snuck into the country but no one else figured it out before them has been a core of the republican party since obama announced in 2006. >> give me a percentage that believe under sodium -- put him in a box, put him in a lie detector. what percentage would pass a lie detector saying this guy is from kenya, whatever, indonesia. how many would buy he's an illegal immigrant? >> about 60% of trump supporters believe it. it seems like a safe number. >> that's 60 of 27. >> okay. >> right. that's 60 of 27. but let's not call the whole country whacky. i love that word element. there's a word that we don't like an element. anyway let's watch this. here is mccain answering a similar situation. he was in trouble at this time. he wasn't leading obama at that time. he was fighting for his life. here is

clearly, there is no clear coherent policy here and lacking in a logical sense. and is this really the best that the european union can do. >> they are moving in the right direction. over night the authorities put the refugees on buses and told them to get out here in the no man's land. so another closed border emerged. an architect from syria, his children and life and a simple explanation, europe hasn't a clue what to do with them. >> they don't know what to do. they don't have a clear plan. that's what i -- >> the best thing that happened was the arrival of volunteers who offered soup to slivering people and food and clothing. but they are doing this because the governments are not and they are less than impressed. >> it is no surprise they are here. everyone, if i would be their president and running a house hold, i would know they are coming, if you have common sense you know the people are going to appear. at the fence they pleaded with the police to come across, just an occasional family got through and everyone else saying why not us as well? the countrie

flip the logic on his head. no, i don't think it's black and white. i think iran does feel insecure. on the other pseuside that irana reactive country in the region. i think iran would be able to integrate itself more if it dealt with some of these broader issues. and i think there's agreement, i think, is kind of a steppingstone for that kind of integration. >> what makes a situation dangerous in the region is that all countries have a deep sense of insecurity. and when the narrative in each country is fundamentally different from the narrative in another country, but the situation would be even more dangerous if you add to that sense of insecurity nuclear weapons. but that doesn't mean that without nuclear weapons you have a stable situation. you don't. and that's why you need diplomatic engagement. and certainly, the narrative in tehran will be, i push forward to enhance my security. but that narrative will, indeed, feed in saudi arabia and other gulf countries, a sense they're under attack. and that perception is perfectly legitimate. and that's,

the whole notion that this somehow would result in her recusal doesn't have any logical support. nocan articulate why that ought to result in her recusal. our case, the freddie gray civil case, does no have anything to do with her case, the freddie gray criminal case. >> some people think it might. what would prevent you from feeding her information? she's the prosecutor in this case and you're representing the other side. >> well, there's no proof of any of that. there's no evidence of any of that. that's pure speculation and i categorically deny that it ever happened. i don't want to interfere with her prosecution and she doesn't want to medicdle in my zefcivil. we haven't been able to get information from her or any other city counterpart that she has given to the defense lawyers. they have more information about this case than we do. >> marilyn mosby appeared at that prince concert and that concert and prince was in support of freddie gray. shouldn't she recuse herself for the good of this case? >> absolutely not. it wouldn't be for the good of the case at all. it's not going to

we need the brits and the chinese and the russians or there ain't going to be no boycotts or sanctions. that's logicalthey'll buy the same stuff from somebody else. why don't people hear that in your party? >> i'm saying it, chris, and you're hearing it. i mean, am i the only one? look, i just think that, first of all, i think a lot of it is i was there for 18 years on that defense committee, and your old boss, tip o'neal, created the space to put me on the committee. working with gary hart and barry goldwater, you learn a lot about how the world works from the great minds of defense. i learned a lot then. i know it matters that we have good allies. that's how we won world war ii. >> everybody out tonight, it reminds me, politics does, of an middle eastern suk saying everybody is working their own stalls. rubio was trying to prove to the rest of the daddy war bucks how height wing he is. carly fiorina was getting even with trump. and huckabee is reading his religious right. what is your constituency? who are your people? >> i'm not worried about standing out. i'm going to just tell people what my expe

if you follow that argument to the logical conclusion, you will end up doing nothing and holding no one accountable. what other atrocities and gay rights, black slavery, you cannot include every human rights violation when you remember certain crime against humanity. when you talk about gay rights, you focused about gay rights. when you talk about this resolution, you're you focus on japan's atrocity to what's 200,000 women. it is not all about the citizens of the world. the argument that this resolution will hurt japanese americans is simply wrong, wrong. japanese americans have done nothing to deserve such a association. japan did what japan did as a foreign government. japanese-americans were victims. they should not be associated with that and we will fight against hate crimes against japanese-americans because of this resolution. we are a multiethnic rights collaboration including many japanese americans like all americans, many japanese-americans want to hold japan accountable for its crimes against humanity. she said, my father went to jail because of the association -- >> thank

logical thing. >> right. the farmer's life was not for you. >> no. >> he grew up in a true farm family.ou milk the cows, tended the animals. daniel claims he never even saw processed food until he was a teenager. [ engine turning ] [ speaking in french ] >> a brief respite by the side of the road and some passersby are apparently less appreciative of fine automobiles than we are. a short consultation with an automotive professional and we are back on the road, back in this case to school. this was daniel's old elementary school in the nearby town of st. pierre de chambio. i'm automatically taken back to memories of my own school days. the smell of caustic pine cleaner, chalkboards and fear. the cruel ministrations of tiny-eyed lunch ladies slopping canloads of prison chow into steam tables. chipped beef, tuna noodle surprise, and powdered mashed potatoes that haunt my sense memories still. >> pumpkin soup today with onion, nutmeg and chicken stock. but basic good pumpkin soup. >> this is marie, head chef, cook, host and server for 320 hungry and very discriminating french schoolchildren

territory but it plans to reprocess and it doesn't have a large -- but it done have a large gee logic depository yet. no one really does. so this -- i don't have an answer because i don't think any of the countries in the region have a real good answer what to do with it but i think they'll be forced into the on site dry cast storage or a centralized facility. >> i will come to you. some questions in the back. i want to make sure those who i can't see in the back, if you really want a question, please come up to the front because i don't want to deprive you of questions because i can't see you in the very back. let me start with this gentleman, i'll come over to the other three hands. name. >> as an american researcher, i guess obviously you don't deal too much with north korea. there was not much mention of how much they have. what kind of -- do they have civilian nuclear or all of it is under military, and what are their, you know, you didn't mention anything, was it because you didn't want? generally american researches are aren't hostile to north korea, which you are not, but -- for effective nuclea

>> there is no resemblance between him and obama at all. there is an i'd logical resemblance. we don't know because we didn't hear the politics. may i recommend him being in charge of china? that would solve the china problem because like president obama did here he will take them down the drain. >> he is in china and well known so the press lets him make a name for himself so it means he is a raging comme, right? >> it was not his looks to obama so maybe it is his resemblance to mou. >> this impress ition -- this impressionist uses real english and jibberish. isn't that racist? >> all of it is a little racist, but i love it. i can't even read the menu at a taco bell. i mess up everything. it is interesting that what they didn't get to is him painting on his eyebrows and it reminded me of the beginning of the great joan rivers documentary called "piece of work" where she gets her face done and goes from a monster to a beautiful piece of work. >> that's right. i didn't see where he was putting on the eyebrows. obama doesn't have prominent owe brows, but does he? >> he over did

that this is a movement which has a desire to have power and prominence and logic doesn't mean much to them. i'm afraid that noes really matter very much to them if they can do this. >> there's a poll that came out today, a rasmussen poll talked about president obama and the issue of race. only 20% of voters believe the president has brought americans of different races together. 47% think that he has driven different races further apart. do you believe that? >> yes. it's part of the whole political polarization. you've got to turn women again men. blacks against whites. workers against employers. the whole bit. because that's how you get more votes and you try to convince as many people as possible that they are victims. and that only by turning to them can they be safe. because they other people are their enemies. to the extent this works there will be more votes. >> you're a brilliant writer. you've taught economics at stanford, at the hoover institution. you wrote a new book and you talk -- we keep hearing about income inequality lately. you talk about the disparity between nations cultures, geographic, de

no. it's not grounded in law. it's not grounded in logic.ut a graphic. 99.4% of the counties in this country are following the law, couples are getting married. this couple should, too. >> evan wilson, thank you very much. thanks for joining us. msnbc live continues next. >>> right now on msnbc live, a campus on lockdown a professor dead and hunt for a person of interest. in california, hundreds of homes burning down as people flee the fastest-moving wildfires in decades. are firefighters making any progress there? >> a new call in ferguson for changes to address racial inequality. >> the summer of trump, as hot as ever. we are waiting a big trump rally in dallas in just about an hour. we will go there. first off, good day to you, i'm richard lui live in san francisco. first off to breaking news. we are hitting hour seven of an active manhunt in a small mississippi city. a shooter on the loose a

logic has from the beginning. when trump first announced there was no support. i was doing focus groups. or two found him interesting. it's greg, it's going, growing with men and now women are responding bus they're not acting that mump differently than member. they're saying enough of the establishment. i want something different. >> i hear from a lot of people, too that say, well, if he says something offensive, i judge him on other issues and other issues he is springs the table and that's that. what explains this? >> well, i think what explains it is hillary clinton has -- is relying on democratic women voters, and women voters do care about trust, and she is failing in that department. extraordinarily. >> but it's a weird juxtaposition? she is losing the female support as the mainstream media has all but called this guy a shove is in and -- chauvinist and is gaining. >> here's the problem for trump. there's a huge opportunity for him. he is doing well among g.o.p. women because republican women are more angry, they're part of the antiestablishment that lee carter talked about, and t

now, i'm not using this as a scare tactic to say if there is no deal that will be a doomsday scenario, but it is important to understand the logic behind this mutual pattern of escalation. the iranians believe that if as a weaker country dealing with six world powers they change or are seen as changing their nuclear policy as a result of sanctions, than thethen the west can put pressure on them to change everything else, all the other strategic decisions that they have to make as well. they want to make sure that the west does not get the signal that sanctions actually will change iranian policy which is why they try to match the leverage that the united states was trying to build with ratcheting up there own nuclear capability which is why i believe that they will escalate if there is no agreement. of course we don't know exactly how or if they would remain below the bedliner not, but if you compare the deal to no deal scenario we will be in a much more difficult situation. now, this gets me to the 2nd point that i wanted to make. imagine we come to the conclusion that we don't like these downward trends in the certainty that w

. >> megan, he could have said that but by that exact same logic, why didn't barack obama stand up and say hey, jeremiah not america -- >> no,it's the exact same thing. >> barack obama is not running for office. donald trump is. >> sorry, he wasn't running for office in 2007 and 2003? >> see, he won the office. and he's now the sitting president. so tha that ship has sailed. >> okay, but it's a parallel argument. megan, i'm sorry. this is a rough night, i guess. >> that's a deflection. you seem to be dodging. are you unconsiderateblemfortable on this issue? >> okay. i will. why didn't he look at him and say he is not a muslim. he is an american citizen. i'm the man who made him produce husband birth certificate. >> i think that could have been an answer. i'm not a genius. i can't figure that out. >> that east okay. that's a reasonable response. we got to it eventually. >> it's a parallel argument, actually. when you rewatch this, you'll see that. >> i'll look forward to doing just that later. joining me now, host of fox news media buzz. hi, guys. so it all relates somehow back to obama in jeremiah wright's church, chris. th

no in and out privileges for the entire weekend. it is almost here just 16 days new until pope francis arrives. >>> a major arc logical find, has people buzz nothing burlington city, new jersey. "eyewitness news" reporter cleve bryan has more on how historians are working to find origin of the massive revolutionary war cannon unearthed this week. >> reporter: too heavy for most men to budge this cannon now stored in the burlington city garage is encrusted in both dirt and mystery. >> it has a story to tell but right now the town is not telling us the story. >> reporter: city unearthed it by accident wednesday while starting construction on the wheelchair ramp at american legion hall in high street. >> we brought folks down from the the state historical department and they indicated that they believe that it is from the 18th century either revolutionary war, possibly war of 1812. >> reporter: shape and size indicate that the cannon was from a ship but who owned it. interestingly both british and americans fired on burlington city. next question why was it buried. perhaps, to keep out, and, people didn't want to look at it. >> after wor

logic. the idea that you and your friends have figured out that obama is not a citizen, and no one else could but this group of birthers. it does not make sense to anybody. the degree that donald trump or any other republican pretended that this is reasonable, the vast majority of americans, white, black, asian, hispanic, jewish, christian, they think that these are silly questions. and the party that plays in this type of mud is seen as less legitimate to other voters. >> but it's as if you need something to move forward in this primary process. the cnn poll just released, more than 40% of republicans believe that president obama is a muslim. what is the backlash to that? >> well, the backlash is that again it's the party. i believe it's a pew poll that showed 66% of trump supporters actually believe that barack obama is first a muslim, as if that would disqualify him from being a president, and that he was born somewhere else than the united states. here's the problem. at some point they're going to have to recognize that with the growth of latinos, the growth of the african-american popula

if you follow that argument to the logical conclusion, you will end up doing nothing and holding no one accountable. what other atrocities and gay rights, black slavery, you cannot include every human rights violation when you remember certain crime against humanity. when you talk about gay rights, you focused about gay rights. when you talk about this resolution, you're you focus on japan's atrocity to what's 200,000 women. it is not all about the citizens of the world. the argument that this resolution will hurt japanese americans is simply wrong, wrong. japanese americans have done nothing to deserve such a association. japan did what japan did as a foreign government. japanese-americans were victims. they should not be associated with that and we will fight against hate crimes against japanese-americans because of this resolution. we are a multiethnic rights collaboration including many japanese americans like all americans, many japanese-americans want to hold japan accountable for its crimes against humanity. she said, my father went to jail because of the association -- >> thank

if you follow that argument to the logical conclusion, you will end up doing nothing and holding no oneocities and gay rights, black slavery, you cannot include every human rights violation when you remember certain crime against humanity. when you talk about gay rights, you focused about gay rights. when you talk about this resolution, you're you focus on japan's atrocity to what's 200,000 women. it is not all about the citizens of the world. the argument that this resolution will hurt japanese americans is simply wrong, wrong. japanese americans have done nothing to deserve such a association. japan did what japan did as a foreign government. japanese-americans were victims. they should not be associated with that and we will fight against hate crimes against japanese-americans because of this resolution. we are a multiethnic rights collaboration including many japanese americans like all americans, many japanese-americans want to hold japan accountable for its crimes against humanity. she said, my father went to jail because of the association -- >> thank you very much. next speaker

logic of mass graves. i suggest strongly that given the fact there is no policy, there is no strategy, no effective way of stemming this horror, that the president of the united states should say so and reckon with the cold logic of mass graves. that was our president. i agree, by the way, with every word he said but how can the american people reconcile these words with pictures of dead children and desperate refugees literally running for their lives? how can president obama say it is our moral obligation to do what we can to prevent the worst atrocities in our world but refuses to do anything to stop the atrocities that are occurring every single day in syria and across the middle east? where is that president obama today? where is the president obama who has spoken so movingly of the moral responsibilities that great power confers? unfortunately, the administration is still -- quote -- "considering a range of options" -- unquote -- i'm not making that up -- a range of options to respond to this issue. and national security council spokesman said this week, in the meantime the president and cabinet offi