shufrich’s close circle, but in fact i would like to agree with you and draw attention to these wordsicion of sowing enmity and promoting russian narratives. please remind me on which channels he sowed enmity and carried russian narratives. and do our tv viewers remember that on february 17, 2022, less than a week before the full-scale invasion with his colleague ms. moseichuk on channel 1+1 nestor shufrych preached to the russian people. i think that today the question must be asked. and how did he get on these channels with unlimited air time and who lobbied him then on these channels when he was always in the right half when he always had a suitable podium, had a suitable microphone and i i am convinced that if in this context we ask the question and who are the accomplices in the work of mr. shufrych, who gave him such opportunities, then we will see and hear very interesting surnames in ukraine. i am convinced that these surnames should be on the list of these forty addresses where searches are being conducted in the case of mr. shutrovych well, i understand that mr. oleksenyuk i

let's start with shufrich.hough this is the topic of last week, nestor shufrich was taken into custody and accused of announcing suspicion of treason, but it will also be a topic. next weeks, since the verkhovna rada of ukraine, as yevheniya kravchuk, the deputy head of the servant of the people faction, has said, intends to consider at the next meeting the dismissal of shufrych from the post of chairman of the committee on freedom of speech, can you explain why the pro-government forces took so long to dismiss shufrych from such an important parliamentary committee, which is the committee on the protection of freedom of speech and information, but there was no such need to change it in the majority, because the representatives of the so-called banned pzh in whatever factions they were not disciplined and voted together with the government er sometimes and we as a democratic opposition vote together when the laws are really needed to protect er in order to overcome the aggressor but very often those laws talk a

and when i go there in poltava oblast, i see them telling me that you can church there and shufricheyou know, i'm more concerned about why it was brought to the point that such a person remained the head of the committee of the new government already in the parliament, freedom of speech is not just a committee - it's a committee that always played a very important role, why did the parliament and the majority in the parliament not care what exactly a person, let's say well, does not usually do anything for freedom of speech, and therefore maybe it was useful, that is, i am interested in other questions, how long was it before that, i remember the beginning of the war and or a large-scale invasion right there shufrich was caught red-handed, i began to remind you that he was simply captured by the territorial defense and handed over to the hands of justice, what is called, and after that no action, that is, i think we will draw conclusions based on the results for me shufrit is this a person who absolutely lobbied for the interests of russia, and during the war what is really important

shufrich suffrized himself with the zelensky regime. he began to serve them.elensky regime will rob him, bring charges against him, find some documents, but their main task is simply to knock out and sophisticate him for millions of dollars, because everything is in speech, he is not a poor man, in addition, he still has the remnants of political influence in transcarpathia and transcarpathia such a loyal region had a need to strengthen the power of the center. whether the shufrich was detained or not has not yet been clarified, while there were searches on his estate, but they are already sewing up a little bit of high treason for him. and accused of treason for three points of participation, this hasn’t happened on russian state channels for a long time, which hasn’t happened in russia for a long time , at least on television, but they decided to remind him. why did america, through the uh , anti-corruption authorities, take on the banking office of the president, it just needs to interrupt this information agenda with something louder and the chosen suffix.

shufrich. came from was once he was my party member once shu.hen she had to make her choice. shufrich was involved with the zelensky regime. he began to serve them. now the zelensky regime will rob him, bring charges against him, find some documents, but their main task is simply to knock out and souffle his millions of dollars, because the souffle is not a poor man, in addition, he still has the remnants of political influence in transcarpathia, and transcarpathia is such a disloyal region, where it is necessary to strengthen the power of the center, shufrich was detained, or not, they have not yet clarified, while there were searches in his estate, but they are already sewing a little bit of high treason on him, i had to and accused him of state changes for three points of participation. on air on russian state channels. it has not happened for a long time, that fridge has not been in russia for a long time, at least on television, but they decided to remember him. why did america go through the uh, anti-corruption bodies ? for the banking off

shufrich was caught red-handed. i want to remind you that he was simply captured by the territorial defense and handed over to the hands of justice, what is called, and after that no action, that is, i think that we will draw conclusions based on the results for me shufrit is this a person who absolutely lobbied for the interests of russia, and during the war, which is really important in this interpretation , because they really consider treason and new laws in a completely different way from the pro-russian position than it was before 2014 and second point, i really hope that all these accusations of treason are clearly documented and from a legal point of view will be perfected because we don't need the show, we need results and when i say that there are people in the parliament who are not brought to justice, there are such stories that, not far from shukhevych , they are far from that and they are free people . that is why the president has the political will . a majority is possible and the issue is resolved v

this has not happened for a long time, shufrich. time at least on television, but they decided to remind him. why did america, through the uh , anti-corruption authorities, take on the banking office of the president, it just needs to interrupt this information agenda with something louder and the suffix banking was chosen and itself is in the grip of western masters. so it is not a fact, for example, that kolomoisky will be able to sit out in the dungeons of the sbu, washington will put pressure and zelensky will hand him over. poland banned ukrainian grain from the university, despite the fact that the european commission lifted the imbargo on kiev exports. we won't listen to berlin we won't let's listen to vonderlein tusk or weber , we'll do it because it's in the interests of the polish farmer. slovakia also imposed an imbargo, and hungary went further and banned it. here at once up to 24 types of ukrainian agricultural products are emphasized in budapest . the land in ukraine belongs to the americans and this. eh, she and washi

shufrich. this is only the tip of the iceberg, and mr. boyko is sitting in the verkhovna rada . mr. boyko is doing well, and many other representatives of the russian federation, moreover, the draft law on banning the russian federation at the local level, and got stuck in the committees of the verkhovna rada and is not brought into the hall yuliya actually we have a few more minutes, respectively, i would like to return to the issue of local self-government, what the novel indicated to me, this is all history and in particular with the military personal income tax and that some other nuances are simply er, they suggest that our decentralization reform can now go back in the opposite direction and return us to what we started from, to some such clear management of management from the center in different spheres, in fact, to yes, if not earlier, well, and we remember of course that there is certain requirements from the eu and from our partners and the issue of decentralization is one of those very important threats that you see here and actually is this a very pessimistic scenario p

shufrich, the hut came once he was my party member once shufrich, she talked so much about miles restoringith russia, but everything changed when it was necessary to make a choice. souffrey. he scratched his head with the regime of the universal suffritch, began to serve him, and now the zelensky regime will rob him, bring charges against him, find some documents, but their main task is simply to knock out the suffritch, his millions of dollars, because the suffritch is not a poor man, in addition, he also has . the remnants of political influence in transcarpathia, and transcarpathia is such a non-loyal region, where it is necessary to strengthen the power of the center whether the shufrich was detained or not is not yet clarified, while there were searches on his estate, but they are already sewing up a little bit of high treason for him. i had to use it and was charged with a government change for three points of participation. e on air on russian state channels. this hasn’t happened for a long time, what hasn’t happened in russia for a long time, at least on television, but they decide

shufrich. she came from bl, he was once my party member once.les about restoring fraternal relations with russia, but everything changed when she had to make her choice. shufrich suffrized himself with the zelensky regime. he began to serve them. now the zelensky regime will rob him, bring charges against him, find some documents, but their main task is - it’s just to knock out and souffle his millions of dollars, because the souffle is not a poor man , in addition, he still has the remnants of political influence in transcarpathia, and transcarpathia had such a loyal region, where they need to strengthen the power center, the suffrich is detained, or not, they have not yet clarified, until there were searches on his estate, but a little bit of high treason was already being accused of him. i would have to blame the government changes for three points of participation, e on russian government broadcasts. this has not happened for a long time. i haven't been to russia for a long time at least on television, but they decided to remind him. why did

perhaps, as an option, shufrich was preparing for the possibility of escape, and that's why they raisedt really a panic, urgently began to work out an even longer deadline, but he didn't escape. it would be very bad. the image of the living is bad . feigen made some kind of program and told them to carry it out. in this case , it is a very important moment that we remember less in the history of mankind. that's right, al capones have already taken some small non-payment of taxes. then igor also left valeriyovych kolomoiskyi was taken with a certain suspicion. but now he is sitting and suspicions have increased. why am i asking casey shufrich, because so far he is charged with treason and cooperation with sivkovych. and at the same time, it is absolutely unclear . and what happened to these assets of one of the coolest oligarchs, no one just shufrych the oligarch never paid attention to this, but we must understand that the uncle has so many gas and oil wells, and so much land is registered for the whole family, for dad and for nestor ivanovich himself, what will happen to the assets tha

the only time i was also at their committee where they gave an assessment and i must say that then shufrichof course presiding , but the votes were well, they were divided about supporting or not supporting that book and about recommendations. it was very difficult to watch exactly that's why i'm from another committee. but i came here to defend the book, that's why there are questions to the authorities . why haven't shufrych been removed yet? there are a lot of things, but for sure we have to see who will fill this quota next and how this committee will work and how it will contribute to freedom. words in ukraine in such a difficult time literally when they do not remain in your opinion who should lead the representative of which faction in particular will it be again some kolpzzheshnik former definitely not a latecomer it should be someone from those parties that are in the opposition i think that this there should be a person from the journalistic environment who has really proved the standard of journalism with his name more than once , if i am now or is understood in these processes,

and the court will issue a fair decision on his punishment together with the shufrich in the verkhovnaa , four dozen more deputies who are elected from the opzzh party, which is officially banned in ukraine there are more than 4,000 deputies of various levels in ukraine, well, that is, in fact, if we talk about this network, a large network, well, it’s a whole network, a large network that continues to operate in ukraine, they move to different factions, to different groups, and there is a certain migration, of course that there will be no local elections, obviously there won't be either. what exactly should people do with their legitimacy, if they were elected from a party that worked in russia, this is recognized as valid in ukraine. look, if the party is banned, it is at least surprising that its representatives continue to work in the authorities and in many regions they are part of the coalition and appoint their representatives, this means that this ban is fictitious because if the party is banned, then obviously at least there should not be representatives in the authorities and

opinion, after such statements, you can't think of a bigger cringe, how can you change her from shufrichs to bragars during the war, this is one of the problems that our partners from the european union always tell us about and tell us about , that, unfortunately, we still do not have any code of ethics for a people's deputy, or there is none at all , even, let's say, elementary disciplinary responsibility of a deputy for, what he, for some individual statements, yes, and that's all after all, this code must be accepted there as well, well, certain points of this kind should be taken into account, well, but of course, first of all, during the formation of the composition of the committee, it is necessary to proceed from the professional qualities of people who are delegated there by the relevant political power, and this is also the political responsibility of this force, yes, whom it delegates to the committee, freedom of speech, well, if in fact this person... has in his background statements that er deny either freedom of speech or freedom of thought development , and so on things mrs.

search, a document with a scheme of autonomy for the donetsk and luhansk regions was found in the shufrichs envisioned the transformation regions with wide autonomy holding pseudo- elections formation of separate governments and parliaments to be transferred down to the verkhovna rada draft budget for 2024 main indicators own revenues of the general fund one trillion 560 billion uah and expenditures three trillion 108 billion more than half of all budget resources will be directed to defense the amount will increase by uah 113 billion so there will be even more weapons and equipment prime minister denys myhal promised 179 billion uah will be allocated to education 202 billion will be spent on medicine to support veterans , more than 14 billion will be sent to taxes, they promise not to raise them, but the minimum salary from the new year will be uah 700, according to the procedure, the project must be submitted to the verkhovna rada by september 15 and is ongoing an important collection of the espresso tv channel and the vesna charity fund are collecting funds for the purchase of modern dro

the right of the polish communist party to be in this hall, actively defended the same man, nestor shufrichhat he would be the chairman of the committee, and nothing was voted on, because here we have a gap between the monomajority and the polish communist party, let's be honest 13 months ago a draft resolution was submitted stating that former members of the opc should not hold positions or be present in this hall, but what the monomajority said was that we and you have constructive cooperation with the opc in contrast to other factions months ago, a draft resolution was submitted by european solidarity to remove shufrych from the post of chairman of the committee on freedom of speech. but no, mr. ruslan, i will leave it at that, there are absolutely no grounds for it. well, unfortunately , just like our special services for more than two years, they simply did not see any grounds at all to to deal with the police and for a year they didn't even see concrete criminal grounds to solve these things but it's good that it has come to this now although we see that psg is beautiful and continues

so who claims who is being discussed to replace the vacant place that was vacated by nestor shufrich,e freedom committee on freedom of speech, you understand intrigue is falling, the secretary is unlikely to go to the head accordingly and lie down and remain. who can be a famous people's deputy, well known for his aphorisms? a force that before the start of full-scale aggression was in opposition, that is , with european solidarity here. in my opinion , there is absolutely no doubt that in the end we are the only force that submitted to the parliament to expel unfortunately, they do not vote for all the deputies from the parliament from the local authorities, we registered a resolution on the removal of shufrych on february 10 separately, you can see this resolution was in place for 2.5 months and then as much after that, when he was searched , a new resolution appeared that actually implemented this idea therefore, in my opinion, this is a desire to put some person in your pocket on the head of the committee on freedom of speech, well, it certainly will not crown all the success. i a

political. that we were watching yesterday evening and when fellow journalists some showed nestor shufriche finger and others quickly clicked with their cameras . enough facts starting even from the official page of the hungarian government, where shufrych provided advice to the government itself in the fight against the ukrainian state in transcarpathia on the facts of cooperation with rasha, there is no place there . as they say, put a stamp and a brand, why suddenly shufrych came out now and not 5 years ago, 10 years therefore, at least last spring , when it was delayed well, why not five to 10 years ago, this is a question of primarily political leadership, which was 5-10 years ago, and here is a question of political work. if we we are talking about the situation here and now, well, shufrych is not the first, look at us we have a process of certain limitation of the influence of the russian orthodox church, we have problems, certain of kolomoisky , we have about shufri, that we still have problems with some, well, let's say those people who were called flight. i have a very high hope

powers of the committee on freedom of speech, which , you know, has been trained and controlled by shufrichver the years. situation, so to speak, the all-conquering freedom of speech in ukraine, uh, so to speak, well, a slight irony, what role should this committee ideally play , ideally, it should be a place where, for example , a media journalist can come and to complain about the actions of the authorities that prevent him from carrying out his journalistic activities and for which he has already appealed to all the lower bodies of management or journalistic self-regulation and did not get his complaint satisfied, the only thing is that when shufrych was in charge of this committee, it turned into the fact that only journalists who covered the pro-russian agenda came with such complaints and they talked about the fact that they were being squeezed out. well, for example , medvedchuk's channels, which were closed, and they er, well, they told us that how one lives badly in ukraine. it was definitely a change of concepts. galina, we know that recently the media detector has been working on

selection of a preventive measure is taking place for the former leader of the people's liberation army, shufrichrought before a court and the court must decide what kind of preventive measure he will have. because the article for treason provides for up to 15 years in prison . to increase obviously the size of the deposit, in a word, there will be a lot of interesting things during this evening, we are waiting for these news , meanwhile, another meeting between putin and lukashenka took place today in the carrier, they both talked a lot, we will analyze it with our guest today, the diplomat and politician valery chalem, we will also mention about how the united states of america is going to restore ukraine, there is already a special representative for the economic restoration of ukraine under a special status, an envoy from biden who will work in ukraine this and how it will work you will find out literally in 15 minutes from the beginning of our program the verdict i hope that you will stay close to your tv screens and stream on youtube in order to hear the wise words of the politician and dip

cage you say god and right there it is ostrich right there it is written strauss that you come to shufrich, then he must have a collection of russian and soviet artifacts, then i was very surprised by the story with this agreement uh bad weather with this document about the creation of the donetsk unification countries the luhansk region was surprised because its presence in shufrych's archives was presented as some kind of huge victory for the investigation. although we all read these proposals in the 14th or 15th year , journalists and deputies and activists spoke against these e-e proposals with a drawer of medvedchuk not before that that they contained elements of treason because they believed that their implementation would make it easier for russia and the military ideological occupation of ukraine that under the guise of these proposals to change the administrative and territorial structure of ukraine is happening . opponents did at that time, which includes medvedchuk, medvedchuk even sued, he sued, well, the question arises. in order to preserve the territorial integrity of ukrain

among them were rinat akhmetov and igor kolomoisky and arseniy yatsenyuk and nestor shufrich.ture fate of the completed objects. what is it and can we say specifically what these objects are? how only objects appear in our main council and become public, and from this moment on we can talk about it. why such a procedure? well, first of all, the enemy does not sleep. eh, the owners are trying in every possible way while they are in ukraine. uh, methods to influence the activities of enterprises, including financial ones, have already been seen. therefore, in this sense, this is a closed work. in addition , the determination of the owners themselves about the fate of the enterprise is a thorough work carried out by, uh, the anti-terrorism commission. and this also, the closed part of the work needs to make sure that this enterprise belongs to them. what is this through shell companies? they just own it, you need to have it here already. eh, father, strategically speaking, this is certainly a very serious movement for crimea. forward. let's talk frankly about these objects. they

of the capital, where a preventive measure is chosen the odious people's deputy did not create a shufrichof treason, and at night the russians attacked khmelnytskyi with martyrs. all 17 drones were destroyed by anti -aircraft defense forces. in zaporizhzhia, the preobrazhenists shelled nearly three dozen buildings and infrastructure objects there in the evening, and the occupiers carried out six airstrikes on orichov on a temporary basis the russians dropped a bomb on the occupied vukakhovka in the kherson region when they attacked the territory controlled by ukraine from airplanes, at least two five-story buildings were destroyed , it is now known about twelve wounded and one dead, also an elderly woman was wounded in the village of vesele by the occupiers , they hid 350 artillery shells per day in the region and mortars, the occupiers shelled three districts of the kharkiv region in the villages of podola and vovchanska , damaged houses, cars, and in the cossack 's eye, hit the church, the railway station and commercial objects. well, 13 settlements the russians shelled in donetsk regio

if i remember his name correctly, and then i assumed on our broadcast that nestor shufrich is most likely the fact that the law enforcement officers can get to him and, in the future, his assets it may affect the arrest and confiscation, apparently we guessed it then, but you see, shufrych turned out to be a little more prepared for a similar situation, so part of the judge's assets were saved. shufrych's family's business houses have not undergone any changes in recent months, and whether they will happen literally today, tomorrow, the day after tomorrow, it could actually be very interesting, then the state will be left without shufrych's assets if it wants them to confiscate women in medvedchuk in transcarpathia, in lviv region, in kyiv, in kyiv region, e. we are just continuing to investigate this process now, formal arrests have been imposed on them, but again, we need to see what is actually happening there. therefore, we need to go to these places and see is it under arrest here, maybe there, it’s already salted , actually, all these stories when certain assets were supposed to be

moscow and also met with miller met with medved met with putin together with melnychuk together with shufrich they were in the same team or now there is still such a selectivity who is already a traitor and who else he is not a traitor, because maybe he has more business there, he still works legally there somehow or some other connections. they think no. well , for now, this hole is a bagel, sharapova, should i go further? this story, please, well, with the same, with visits to potential state traitors, please. well, we hope that all their representatives are further away from the banned pro-russian faction and its pzj. yuriy boyka, of course, is also a big question . why do law enforcement agencies still not announce any suspicions from the rules regarding him ? he still has the title of hero of ukraine. last week, we heard a report from our military that ukraine had recaptured the boyko towers, and yuriy boyko, a direct figure in the corruption investigation of these towers, is still in the parliament, still with the title of hero of ukraine and more. in general, in this convocation there

screenshots appeared on the internet a week before the full-scale aggression of february 22, when shufrich a mega amount of time in prime time on the pluses for that. to express his position, who then let him there, through whose mouth did shufrych speak then, i believe that today the committee on freedom words should be defended by an independent, non-engaged, pro-european person who will defend freedom of speech and no matter the surname, and the regulations provide for someone, for example, to be co-opted into the committee, and after that, of course, for example, he would head it, there are no problems, and i believe that the norm should be maintained here, when the committee on freedom of speech is chaired by a person from the opposition. since february 24, european solidarity has publicly stated that we will not criticize the government, we will not be in the opposition, because we have to win the war, this is the first and most important task, and look at the votes, all the votes that go for security, for defense, for european integration and course... nato, there are european solid

specific moment you can turn to the opzh and ask them to vote for certain things that until recently shufrich headed the committee freedom of speech, although european solidarity fought for a long time to remove such, i do not say that it, and now, mrs. victoria, the committee is temporarily headed by the son, the nanny of the children of volodymyr zelenskyi bragar, was made by a person who at one time appealed.. . to the ministry of education with a proposal to cancel such a lesson as the history of ukraine for the fifth grades, well, you understand, these, well, these are valuable moments, well, i do not understand at all how such a person can represent the interests of, well, some, he said that what should be sell the dog and pay for the gas, here is kornienko of course, i just remember, 2000 , in my opinion, it was the third year, i, as a journalist , was present in the hall when they tried to push through changes to the constitution, then , in my opinion, three votes were not enough when they wanted to make the prime minister a key figure and kuchma became the prime minister and in fact

shufrich.ier he spoke on russian and ukrainian television channels with anti-ukrainian statements, not out of place in his political career. six times, he was elected to the verkhovna rada after the situation worsened. in donbass, he began to represent the party's opposition platform for life, but now it is political the structure is prohibited in ukraine. finland has closed entry for cars with russian license plates. from this day on, only permanent eu citizens, members of their families living in our country, diplomats or persons equivalent to them, as well as for humanitarian reasons will be able to enter the country in a car registered in russia. as customs officials have already noted, russian cars in the country must leave the country within 6 months. otherwise, the vehicles may be confiscated. i remember it earlier. similar measures were introduced by all three baltic countries. the us national security councils of south korea and japan issued a joint statement in which they threatened m