but some of these mines were laid during the creation of the soviet union, for example, the organizationhe ussr as a union of equal national republics with the right to secede and initially the vision of the soviet union was not only as a new edition of big russia well, as the basis for the world socialist revolutions well, we 'll talk more about history a little later in the second part of the program. and now the results of the year and how they were influenced by the processes that began with the building and especially with the collapse of the soviet union dmitry, how do you see what we are seeing today again? and a special military operation, a military conflict , and a denocification, which is carried out by ukraine, and on the other hand, a denocification of ukraine that is taking place. is all this inevitable. was all this inevitable after the collapse of the soviet union dmitry depends on what it means it was inevitable, what we mean by it, if we mean by it how specifically it started, and the special operation, how specifically certain countries reacted to this operation. it pr

if you see a sort of unifying ideology in modern russian society like the one that was in the soviet union. because obviously for most i would say of the soviet period, people were united by this one idea communism. they wanted to build communism and that was something they had to strive towards. do you think that the modern russian people have something like that? and if not, what could fill that gap? could not fill that gap, we could not return to this solving time, but in spite of some sympathy, growing sympathy to the time. but to return is impossible because we where we could not accept this dogma is max is out of over the questions. so we need to get further and to, to, to mixer, demands of social justice. so that future wis traditional traditional well use for bi recently statement of our president. and that has made a degree in order to or talk to the fans and of a firm on the political level, traditional values in russian society. so i think that's, that should be outside of political western modernity. we need to explore more rational tradition, tradition of slumber files of the

this was a bit too much plus for the soviet union. here it is. ecretary of the coma wanted to have a factory about themselves, which you . uh, various weapon systems led to the fact that we had a bunch of submarine projects . we had a bunch. uh, uh, anti-air defense systems, but in general, enough mistakes have been made and, uh, unfortunately, uh, now uh, the concept of strategic stability. uh, he's leaving gradually. e into oblivion, because i consider the achievement of some new agreements by the united states in the current conditions. eh, totally unbelievable. well, it seems to me that russia is trying not only trying. it still maintains strategic stability, but not at the same price as the soviet union did, and not necessarily with the help of those treaties that took place during the cold war. still, the strategic is determined by non-treaties, but still we need to have then, if we want to have such stability of strategic stability is politics. in principle, but then you need to achieve parity by the united states, first of all. in the econ

in the form of the soviet union.aid that whoever does not regret the collapse of the soviet union has no heart, who dreams of restoring it in the form in which it was before? yes, it doesn't have a head you cannot enter the same troops twice. you want to say vladimir putin's empire vladimir putin allows the re-creation of the soviet union in some other form, he does not allow, he strives and works all these years to return russia as a great power, that's what we are talking about, because the soviet union is russia in the form of a union socialist state and the collapse of the soviet union - this is the collapse of russia, we lost colossal russia want to be like, look. i didn’t interrupt you, you continue to work on these cooperatives there, resell. so. yes, hello, i did . i didn't resell anything. yes, so, here i am for you for the sake of the children. a man now and russia is an intellectual, in short, as a result of the actions that putin is taking and he is building this unity of our history on a completely symbo

and e for soviet union would survive. and now this a catastrophic eat a will be a kind of room, eurasia newnan, a kind of your asian empire, or return to that when the classical russian empire, with strategical central isn't ant multiplicity, all the ads in new groups leaving inside. so i think that was quite possible. and precisely now we are dealing with the will of the most goal to reconquer of this edge of political space. there is the moment of the return to the geopolitics because a lent power once more once now, to re assure re affirm its independence sovereignty in front, off the collective west that ease to day, under, oh, almost full control of that as well. and this is the balance, socratic, a lead off superpower. now, we are reconstructing this journey job political space without overlay, without, ah, soviet ideology, but trying to restore the greatness over the empire, or recreate. oh, great. you're asian union. oh, greer. and you fall, the soviet union, of course, is something that's studied very heavily and

legacy of the soviet union the soviet union printed this. undermined himself with this perestroika of this energy of change, these numerous social movements - these are people who have read literature that was printed in the soviet union by two-thirds and were not at all spetsnaz, trotsky was spetsnaz, because it was believed that he had some kind of it's a magical hostile wand. he is a marxist leninist, but wrong. that's the worst thing. at it could be read. e from laurel to bakuni, for anyone. it inspired the youth at the time. eh, well, and we know some now even visible in politicians who started by reading these books. well, maybe then they changed their mind to the opposite. nice, but uh, they just go the other way. now this is the trend, but can the trend be reversed? well then , let's look for new ideals. thanks a lot. thanks to historian alexander shubin this year was important and extremely nervous for china turmoil and provocation around taiwan historical twentieth congress of the ccp debilitating quarantines and their sudden lifti

council it was the soviet union council it was the soviet union russia is not the soviet union russia is not the soviet union russia is not the soviet union so in many ways russia doesn't really so in many ways russia doesn't really so in many ways russia doesn't really exist exist exist in terms of the united nations because in terms of the united nations because in terms of the united nations because the soviet union is who had that seat the soviet union is who had that seat the soviet union is who had that seat not russia and ukraine was as much of not russia and ukraine was as much of not russia and ukraine was as much of the soviet union the soviet union the soviet union and belarus is as much of the soviet and belarus is as much of the soviet and belarus is as much of the soviet union and the stands are as much of the union and the stands are as much of the union and the stands are as much of the soviet union as was russia soviet union as was russia soviet union as was russia so you can make an argument there that so you can make an argument there that so you can make an

the colonialists from the ussr, firstly, the engine of modernization turned off not only in the soviet union soviet admired the global processes here, because all that could survive from it. uh, industrial urban societies have been created, there are too many of them for the global world. so much industry, so much industrial production of the global world. it turned out not to be necessary. this is a tragedy, hence the tragedy of bangladesh myanmar, here are countries that, as it were, their modernization is no longer needed, therefore , perhaps post-modernization is needed, but no one has demonstrated it yet, so here. yes, we can return if we propose a project to the soviet union, because it did not give rise to colonization. he offered new independent state its alternative. that is, if you want, please don't be around the so-called realism actually. this is a system of peripheral capitalism that is independent and independent. she. in general, it is not very important to her. it is about the economy, they are about the state system. but if you are independent and want to be truly independe

we knew very little about the soviet union army back then because stalin would not let anyone in. e had purged the senior staff of the soviet army. in fact, in the book, i found that george marshall, when the soviets invaded, with a not seasoned baited the soviet union, called in a bunch of reporters and executive editors and sad, we don't know what's going on there, can you help us find out? one of them was wallace carols boss who said, you, know the u.s. governments, intelligence, needs to know what the status says that the soviet army, and if they're going to be able to hold off this onslaught. marshall himself felt, oh, only for a couple of months. the thought was there just going to be overrun and so on. when he went into the soviet union, that was his purpose. that. to find out. so therefore, when he went to the front lines, and he observed and he said i only have my eyes to observe, in the people i can contact. he came back and said, yes. his feeling was that the soviet union was going to be able to hold off the knot seas, and they were committed, they were behind it. then h

december 30, 1922 one hundred years ago, the first all-union congress of soviets proclaimed the creationthe union of soviet socialist republics, the history of the xx century, largely determined the very fact of the existence of this state. now, more than 30 years after its abolition, no less influence. his absence, the year of the centenary of the ussr, seems to have specially returned life to the course of events. the revolution of the seventeenth year was understood in the world as a mistake of history was the opinion that it should have happened in industrial europe and not in agrarian russia, but the young republic survived, thanks also to the european proletariat, there is a known case of a demonstration in support of the country of the soviets on the champs-elysées in paris she is met by the seventeenth rifle regiment to the french army, which is supposed to disperse the demonstrators from a column of workers. a man comes out, unbuttons his coat, shows the awards of the first world war and says, glorious fighters of the 17th regiment. are you really going to shoot me, after which

or the cis - is this a mini soviet union according to you? has the passing year been the final answer to the fact that such a union cannot exist, well, at least with the participation of ukraine and moldova and other countries, unless with the exception of belarus, you know, we both love history and have seen many strange unions in history, which should not have been, but nevertheless took place, so i would not completely reject the impossibility of this or that union, but there is no doubt that this time putin is chasing your dream to rebuild the russian empire even on the soviet union, namely the russian empire, will lose russia itself, and it is obvious that putin is now desperate for any allies, because traveling by train or plane between moscow and minsk is something moscow and phanyan does not give him any pleasure, but no one else, his allies, are particularly eager to use the tools in russia, or rather in the kremlin, to convince or force him to join another club of the ussr, the cis there, or anything else is currently impossible, the

there were almost no private cars to lie in your own hot bath before khrushchev in the soviet union. oviet person to buy a moskvich zaporozhets volga car or rent it in order to travel to the crimea, georgia, the baltic states in the summer. and what is this curious about cars new car? no, you can’t take it off, this is just an option for a trial model, you can’t take off miniskirts. true, khrushchev did not allow the soviet union a little later, brezhnev would give up this position . but poetry ceases to be only party and love. now you can not only home. i'm walking around moscow, a picture of soviet happiness, which was not intended after the war, 20 years have passed, but it's already purely fresh fun and everything is ahead, please, are you by chance not a class here? and who are you? no, it's just a matter of that you are already here for the fourth time digging in this place. let's dig. so you have to understand, understand. three military children, director georgy daneliya cameraman vadim yusov and screenwriter gennady shpalikov, when they grew up, made a film about happiness, w

and so behind india, this friday marks the 100th anniversary of the funding of the soviet union. the country existed for 7 decades with russian president lovingly describing its collapse as the greatest geopolitical tragedy of the 20th century. they should have it so even lost a bit. i'm going to layers if wishing in 1991 and bill of air sky pusher without asking the will of ordinary citizens, representatives of event party elite decided to collapse the u. s. s. r and people suddenly found themselves cut off from their homeland. this tore apart, dismembered our people's community and turned into a national catastrophe. as once after the revolution, the borders of the union republics were cut behind the scenes. so the last leaders of the soviet union, contrary to the direct expression of the will of the majority of the people in the 1991 referendum, ruined our great country. and simply confronted the peoples with a fact. will a treaty to create the union was signed in 1922 by 4 socialist republics, russia, belarus, ukraine, and the trans caucus and republic, which later split into

we hope for ukraine - it will be possible, vasyl , very often we even say and we say that the soviet unionan occupation or let's say soviet, then the audience begins to justify us correcting, saying that it was not soviet, but soviet and neo-occupation, but ukraine was part of this soviet union, moreover, if we include the representatives of the baltic countries in our ether, then they say that during the occupation of the soviet regime, why do ukrainians who seem to have a pro-ukrainian position and for the independence of ukraine, who are now opposing russia because there literally just a penny when i was still at school it was so strange, that is, in the 17th year of the revolution, lenin defeated the communists, and then once and for five years they are waiting for something to create a union, and just until the 21st year was the ukrainian people's republic. well, why do ukrainians not accept that the soviet union was an occupation for ukraine? i would formulate the question a little differently, because we are once again dealing with a stereotype, an imposed stereotype, which i think

and we knew very little about the soviet union army back then because stalin would not let anybody in. he had purged the senior staff of the soviet army and in fact, in the book i found george marshall when soviets invaded, when the nazis, the soviet union, he called in a bunch of reporters and executive editors and said, we don't what's going on there? can you help us find out? and one of them was was boss who said, you, you know, the us government intelligence needs to know what the status is of the, of the soviet army and if they're going to be whole, be able to hold off this onslaught and himself felt, oh, only for a couple of months, you know the thought was, oh, they're just going to be overrun and so on and so forth. so when went into the soviet union, that was his purpose is that to find out and so therefore when he went to the front lines and you and he said, i only have my eyes to observe and the people i can contact, he came back and said, yes. his feeling was that soviet union was going to be able to hold off nazis and that they were committed and they were behind it. and

they didn't like the soviet union, none the less, you know, you didn't mention the soviet union, you have to just, you, except that it had interest and you didn't across any red line for the soviet union that disappeared at the end of the cold war. and russia has repeatedly, i said, you know, we, we want to return to that. you show us the respect that is due to us as a great, a refuse to russia, time and time again. i mean, you know, we talk about all of the various agreements from which the western withdrawn, the united states is growing like the abm treaty, the i and i treat it all. it was just a reflection of the lack of respect the united states have garage and i think that what triggered you know, the launch of the civil special military operations is that i have to show you need to show respect for otherwise we're just not going to have any peace or security in europe, because ultimately when we're not going to just tolerate you, surrounding us with hostile states and just sort of boxing is in as if we, you know, we're, we're, you know, we're going to publish that. you could ju

versions and on products for previous anniversaries, in the center we see the constitution and the union of sovietialist republics, and around the flags of the union republics, they were all somewhat similar. here is this constitution the adoption of which at one time declared the creation of the ussr as a state, it happened on july 6, 1923, but the day of the founding of the union, which was usually celebrated this holiday, is considered another december 30, 1922, so stalin decided. but why is there such a discrepancy buried in this treaty, which is now carefully preserved in archives, but we found a copy of it here is the link государственный архив русский Федерация fund 3316 о 51 delo пять 30 december it was said that each union republic will have its own government here ot at the very end of the regulation, the right of free exit from the union is preserved for each of the union republics. this treaty was indeed signed on december 30, 22, but not in the final version, so why was it approved on the 30th ? let's talk further about the soldiers who walk the square no longer with the flag of the r

the soviet union opens ideas. new, the dynamo stadium, where it is reliably known that he went, including to watch the competitions of the first ussr sports day, which was positioned as such an alternative to the world's red olympic games. it is possible that a conversation between the daich and the connor took place in these stands , but it is reliable. it is known that at the meeting in moscow, it was connor who suggested that his young compatriots come to a completely other games. who knows perhaps when arnold deutsch was drowning in the arctic ocean 80 years ago, the last thing he could think about was how he first saw the seas, everything was the seas, sparkling warm, the southern mediterranean, gentle dawns. now the cicada will sing some mysterious paths. along the coast in the summer of 28, here specifically in syria fell. well, dachas send romania and greece, it’s clear that an organization called ums is not on any vacation, and we ’ll start with the last and cue, stands for, as the executive committee of

and why did you return to the soviet union, he smiled and said the soviet union is the only country inhe world where you can do nothing and the austrian refugees did not die, who were assigned to the factories of the new socialist industry, and who were the higher educational institutions of the comintern unfortunately, many were thrown off in the early stalinist repressions of others saved by the fact that at that time the comintern sent them to fight on the side of the republican spain by the way, there are speeches in the personal file and a passport of the spanish republic, what he did there, it looks like this is in those places of the case that have not yet been dissected. but today we understand what kind of people connected with austria were then studied in moscow not only at the station comintern but also through a couple of stops station. in intelligence at that time, a completely opposite approach was used; other foreigners , the communists, were invited to move away from comments in the winter. all this enthusiasm for marxism in leninism was a mistake of youth, but now you

was they who should be the legal successors of all those issues and functions performed by the soviet unionl, i am definitely more than convinced that there were some lobbying efforts , including corrupt russian and soviet diplomats who worked with by other states that actually supported this decision, but now we can of course talk a lot about how such a problem happened, the most important thing is to find ways out of the current situation and try to rush to russia from where it should never be, and i think that this issue is actually not one maybe in a month or even a year, and it will be accepted according to all the lengthy procedures there, similar to trials at international tribunals, i am more than convinced that russia will use all the levers to use all opportunities to either convince or promise some uh-uh offers of advantages to other states or banally bribe them or blackmail them as they are used to doing so that the un countries are probably not the most democratic, again this decision was blocked or at least delayed the decision-making process, but the un general assembly is th

we know that in 1939 , when the soviet union attacked finland , the soviet union was expelled from the league of nations for this attack, for aggression, and we know that the league of nations after the second world war war was also reformed and it was actually transformed into the organization of the united nations, we know that now the ukrainian delegation to the un is demanding the exclusion of the russian federation from the security council of the united nations, since it did not illegally become a member of the security council in 1991, taking the place of the soviet union. well, not only in the security council and and at the un today, the ministry of foreign affairs of estonia stated that the majority of the member states of the security council do not share ukraine's approach to the issue of russia's membership in the organization, accordingly, the question of russia's exclusion in the opinion of the estonian ministry of foreign affairs is now almost without promising well, is it possible to draw analogies between 1939 and 2022, when the ussr attacked finland, and in 22, russi

1990s, but the story that we can tell about the three baltic republics that were also part of the soviet union since 1945, it is a very different story from the story of ukraine in the 1990s, so, by discussing this a little bit, this divergence between these four former soviet pieces of the soviet union, i think we can get to a sharp and good understanding of ukraine's situation in the 1990s. latvia, lithuania, and estonia, all quite small country's population lies, they were on the track in the 1990s, they only got in the first decade of the 21st century, but they were on the track to join the european union, and to join the nato alliance. these were countries that very much perceived themselves as european, they head deep ties to populations in western europe. and the united states, and they also seemed, as smaller countries, very manageable as countries that could be brought into the european union. you know, they made a lot of the internal reforms legal, and economic reforms that were legal to necessarily join the european union and nato. there are objects of desire joining these western c

gas from siberia came to germany in 1973, and a flow of currency poured into the soviet union to allowgging holes already ineffective. the noah of the soviet economy exchanged dollars for soviet rubles, the most stable currencies in the world. then it seemed that it would always be like this, but the ussr had an inexhaustible margin of safety, everything was fine. and why else improve something? here's how leonid bream's caution regarding change, recalling in his memoirs his niece love brezhnev at first, he was frightened, like the rest of the members. the politburo experiments khrushchev who, with his reforms, brought the country to an economic disaster. secondly, he believed that neither the country nor the people were ready for radical changes, his uncle said during one conversation, what are you, what kind of reforms am i even afraid to sneeze loudly. god forbid a pebble roll after him. avalanche, our people know nothing of true freedom. nothing like a capitalist attitude economic freedom will bring chaos. this will start cutting each other. under brezhnev, the communist party of t

tell about the three baltic republics, latvia, lithuania and estonia that were also a part of the soviet union since 1945, is a very different story from the story of ukraine in the 1990s. and so by discussing just a little bit this divergence between these four former soviet pieces of the soviet union, i think we can get to a sharp and good understanding of ukraine situation in the 1990s, latvia, lithuania and estonia. they're all quite small countries population wise. we're on the track in the 1990s, they only got there in the first decade of the 21st century, but they were on the track to join the european union and to join the nato alliance. these were countries that very much perceived themselves as europe in that had deep ties through diaspora populations to western europe and the united states. and they also, as smaller countries, very manageable as countries that could be brought into the european union, nato, they made a lot of the internal reforms, legal and economic reforms that were necessary to join these western institutions of the european union. in-a-row they were sort of objec

and why did you return to the soviet union the soviet union is the only country in the world where youo nothing and not die of hunger. today we we understand what kind of people connected with austria were then studied in moscow, not only at the comintern station, but also after a couple of stops. in intelligence at that time , a completely opposite approach was used, other foreign communists were invited to visibly move away from the comintern, all this passion for marxism and leninism was a mistake of youth, but now you can no longer have anything to do with communism to the soviet union, they were asked to move away from public agitation propaganda and go and work in secret to conduct such conversations. yes, and what thirty-fourth sent to london here is his subscription to the library of the british museum according to legend. he came to study psychology at the university of london, but he was also keenly interested in universities in a couple of other english cities from a memorandum from a diver in moscow. the center universities at cambridge and oxford are known for their leftis

nato always tried to adapt itself to the new conditions after the disintegration of the former soviet union. for example, they post soviet geography and all the new, the independent states that also invited to the next to didn't know if that led to corporation counsel. and then in $1094.00, you would you call that the partnership for peace idea was promoted. russia always thought that partnership for peace was an interesting idea, but it could perhaps create a kind of an unjustified equality to russia with the other countries. and i always sold that it was a, it had to be treated differently by nature. and that was not be for security reason a given the size that scale and was just a reason why the, for the nato russia council. that's the reason why i need to rush a finding x plus sign. so it was a very privy station to situation. and it was a very privileged offer to russia. i'm the only for russia, it was wonderful russian where it all its privileges. own display right now on the your korean battlefield. i very, my g grant, they failed. so i mean, it is, it hurts because if you're involve

but it's also absolutely clear from a historical perspective that the leaders of the soviet union and russia received assurances that there would be no expansion eastward of nato. and there were repeated warnings from luminaries across the, the west, including george kennan, including henry kissinger, including even william burns, the current director of the ca, that across the political spectrum in russia, there was antipathy, entirely understandable, and typically towards nato expansion. that there had been assurances given that the breaking of those assurances would have potentially catastrophic consequences for europe and west relationships with russia. and we simply conveniently forgot all of that. because the ice days decided that its status is the world sole superpower was at risk. and that it needed to take measures to weaken russia and then beyond that to weaken what it seems to regard as its prime competitor, china. well, you, anthony, almost exactly. one year ago, russia sent to nato and to washington to notes ultimatums, whatever you want to call them about, you know, it's

and certainly it came to an end of the and the 1991 when the soviet union disintegrated. but the dissolution of warsaw pact was a very interesting development. and then they to react to that by establishing the not that lengthy corporation council. by in writing, the former was that countries as partners, as their partners are well partners, partners, but it was a different body. the body itself was the called, the north atlantic corp counsel. and it was a kind of a new by david would give a kind of it equal chance to all the partners who the members of the not that equal chance of course, made to always side to adapt itself to the new conditions after the disintegration of the former soviet union, for example, they post soviet geography and all the new, the independent states that also invited to the next to didn't know if that went to corporation counsel. and then in 1994. you would, you call that the partnership for peace idea was promoted. russia always thought that partnership for peace was an interesting idea. but it could perhaps create a kind of an unjustified equ

no one in the west seems to want to use that logic, but it was the west and the soviet union that came up with that logic that kept the peace in europe during the cold war. so what are they missing? go ahead and boucher. well this, do you are quite correct. this was where it ended, the call ended up preventing the cold war from turning hot. unfortunately, it was red con, from history and to 90 each amid this whole end of history triumphal as that that became the ideology to sure. in washington. and the helsinki process basically became a conveyor belt for the us to brow beat, other countries into doing it, speeding and this doctor and it wasn't quite so clearly formulated. but they basically said that the only sovereign truly sovereign country in the world is us. and everybody else has to do what they are told, or else. and we saw what or else meant in 1999. when nato proceeded to attack you, then you with slow via, without any sort of breaking, do you want charter, its own charter, the hell? think you charter all imaginable charters? it was privy to and it did that was just basically

these transcripts of the documents, which means during the discussion about the formation of the soviet uniont the representatives of ukraine chernihiv province. well, even then they were formed, like the ukrainian, soviet socialist republic, yes. in general, they were called to say now moscow is the capital for now, but then in the near future, before the eyes of our generation , we will see that the capital will be moved to london. you can imagine london, the capital of the ussr, for 100 years, in all seriousness, there was thunderous applause, by the way. yes, and it wasn't a joke. it wasn't a figure of speech that much. well, yes, it is a must. well, where is the proletariat in the world? where else to lead? sure thing? there is just the grave of karl marx. well , in this regard, yes, a lot of illusions of such naive expectations were laid, but then it so happened that we really. that's what we suddenly donbass uh, i'm now on the example of my native land. yes, he ended up outside his native russia , yes, that’s what we got, the consequences of these bloody, terrible twenty- second years

true, khrushchev did not allow the soviet union a little later, brezhnev would give up this position.now you can not only home. i'm walking in moscow picture of the soviet happiness, which was not conceived after the war, 20 years have not passed, but it’s already purely fresh fun and everything is ahead, please, you don’t accidentally put no, no, it’s just that you are already digging here for the fourth time in this place. let's dig. so you have to understand, understand. three military children, director georgy daneliya cameraman vadim yusov and screenwriter gennady shpalikov, when they grew up, made a film about happiness, when there are friends, when love awaits, and when you are understood. sveta sveta, well , the cinema is separate, and life is separate, in the meantime prices are rising khrushchev shoots a demonstration of the workers of novocherkassk who opposed the high cost introduces the death penalty for economic crimes by money changers and guild workers. here they are the head belonged to this suitcase in a suitcase under clean shirts rumbles hid acquired by far unclean

well, here is 100 years of the soviet union and which he misses so much. i think that we have nothing to wait for, because even if we talk about the creation of the ussr, on december 30, er , only the initial act of this rather long-term process took place, the legalization of the ussr lasted until 1925, so er options for the transfer of the date is more than enough that can happen in december, let's say in a political or historical-political plan, it is possible that there will be some of his speeches in which he will try to plan before the lord the goals of a military political operation or to mark some points er, also based on the historical genre, although er, his refusal from er, most of the public performances at the end of this year indicates that nothing is possible and there will not be, because er, such an enchanting result, what would he set up in the form of a return in the bosom of ukraine, let's say, the only part of the russian empire or the composition of the fraternal family of the soviet union, it did not happen. this is your colleague, y

no one in the west seems to want to use that logic, but it was the west and the soviet union that came up with that logic. they kept the peace in europe during the cold war. so what are they missing? go ahead in the bushes. well this you are quite correct that this was entered, the call ended up preventing the cold war from turning hot. unfortunately, it was red con, from history and ninety's amid this whole end of history, triumphalism that, that became the ideology as you are in washington. and a healthy prostate basically became a conveyor belt for the us to browbeat other countries into doing its bidding. and this doctrine that wasn't quite so clearly formulated. but they basically said that the only sovereign truly sovereign country in the world is us. and everybody else has to do what they're told, or else. and we saw what or else meant in 1999. when nato proceeded to attack you, then you was flavio without any sort of breaking you went charter, its own charter to health. think you charter all imaginable charters it was privy to and it did that was just basically ok. we did it be

true, khrushchev, the soviet union did not let brezhnev give up this position a little later. ses to be only party and love. now you can not only home. i'm walking around moscow, a picture of soviet happiness, which was conceived after the war 20 years has not passed, but it's already pure fresh fun and everything is ahead, please. no, it's just that this is the fourth time you've been digging in this place. let's dig. so you have to understand, understand. three military children director georgy daneliya cameraman vadim yusov and screenwriter gennady shpalikov, when they grew up they made a film about happiness, when there are friends, when love awaits, and when they understand you. light and light yes, light, well, the cinema is separate, and life is separate, meanwhile prices are rising khrushchev shoots a demonstration of the workers of novocherkassk who opposed the high cost, deduces the death penalty for economic crimes by the money changer and guild workers. here they are roaring in a suitcase under clean shirts roaring, hiding the capital acquired by a far from unclean