how strong is nato? the russian president vladimir putin viewed the eastern expansion of nato as both a threat and betrayal of a purported promise and booting size. it was a breach of trust that justified russia's attack on another country. he made that clear and an address to the nation 3 days before a russian troops invaded ukraine. the scene is gonna be just keep close enough to diagnose loaner cars based on a need, but i would like that i substitute system. i be speaking. who does that process? that is the project, right? and they say that again, sort of, i mean, we were supposed to be speaking into that process, the motions. so similar to what was the level of you, this is daniel crane, another. it's a pretty maya mr. holmes. who was the senior a business like like by the mass. oh yeah, no, it seems like it's like, oh my gosh, was name be sure to get something even though some guy who comes up. so for most of us hope you're doing, you get a minute. so you can look at what's the 1st on the sample i b

what, if anything, can nato do as a collective whole under the auspices of nato? gen. gavoli: right. the shortest possible answer, ma'am, is member nations of the alliance always retain their full sovereignty. they make their decisions and they can make those decisions at any time. it is entirely conceivable or theoretically conceivable that article four could be invoked, discussions could be held. nations could decide to declare that an article five situation has happened, and then a nation might decide, what i think is necessary for me is to do nothing. that is certainly possible. in my view it is not very likely . what i have seen in nato is that it is very hard to get consensus but once you get to consensus, it is hard to back out of it. once you get to consensus, you have a firm thing, so the consensus of invoking article five drags everybody along with it. it is hard to see a nation folding its arms and sitting it out but that is theoretically possible. that is why an alliance composed of 32 sovereign nations will always be. to your direct western about what auth

nato's position is somewhat hypocritical: nato says: "you can become a member of nato as soon as you win the war. and you don't need it anymore. i think that some of our western european friends are using the idea of ​​ukraine joining nato as a bargaining chip with russia, which, you know, it's not that bad, leave ukraine, then we promise you that ukraine will not be in nato, and if you don't withdraw, we will freeze the conflict, then the rest of ukraine will be in nato. there is no desire to wage war with russia. in western europe, you know, this is an absolute red line, and what about your opinion on the eu. the accession to the eu will be in stages, as it happened with us. first you join the deep comprehensive free trade area in accordance with the association agreement. the most difficult point to negotiate will be agriculture, because your agriculture. you are a big country, so your membership will change the balance of power within the eu. ukraine and poland together will have more votes in the council and more members of parliament than germany. he is being hypocritical, tell

to what extent is opposition to the nato bloc possible? nato bloc. nato bloc with conventional weapons, as a result of its superiority in conventional means of armed struggle. but from our side, any course of hostilities will be extremely unprofitable. we mean, well, advantage in almost everything, in all positions, several times, and therefore, as it seems to me, any confrontation with... the nato bloc is possible only by the use of nuclear weapons, well, there is simply no other option, therefore that there is such a concept, it is called the basic law of war, the basic law of war, what he says is that the course and outcome of the armed struggle is determined by the combined military and economic potential of the parties, but if the nato military organization surpasses us by an order of magnitude according to some indicators, and even for two or three, then engage in such an armed confrontation only with the usual means of hurray. well, since the war is still not going on with the nato bloc with ukraine, especially with ukraine, which is not given

that possible, what are you not you understand what nato is, nato is just a kind of, well, like a commonwealthnd of round dance, like, people want to join it, join, want, speak out, leave and so on, but as i understand it, here it is true, well, it is true, everyone talks about it, yes, well, that is what i am talking about, you see, entry is a ruble there, and exit is not even two, all five. that is, they do not let you out of your own free will, as i understand it, yes, from nato, well, france france almost left almost almost - this is an important word in this case dropped out, that is, the headquarters in from france, that is, the first headquarters let me remind you it was during the time of charlotte de gaulle quite a long time ago plus it almost means almost really from there was even such a letter charlotte de gaulle here he says that we have all this letter and just what it cost gold from me yes give us please the letter charlotte de gaulle. france believes that the changes that have occurred since 1949 in europe, asia and the rest of the world, as well as the evolution of its own sit

we informed the nato command, and also closely exchanged information.er the information about the fall of the russian drone, the ministry of foreign affairs of latvia summoned the temporary charge d'affaires of russia dmytro kasatkin for a conversation. after that, the diplomat was met by journalists, but he answered their questions reluctantly, said that the information was being checked, and when the journalist asked whose drone it was, the man replied that he had no idea, and also added, data that this drone was russian for the russian side is not confirmed. it is intentional, but these actions are considered dangerous and irresponsible. russian drones fall on the territory of nato due to the inaction of the member countries of the alliance. this is the opinion expressed by the minister of foreign affairs of lithuania. and the newly appointed head of the ukrainian foreign ministry, andrey sybiga, called the violation of nato member states' airspace a harsh reminder that russia's aggressive actions are already beyond the borders of ukraine and called

of nato's torani corridor. it is also known as nato's torani corridor , mr. dr. kazemi. what is the corridor ? what are the most important goals they are pursuing now to bring up and start this issue again? well, mr. doctor , in fact, it is important to clearly explain the context of the issue here, based on the evidence that actually existed before the second qorbagh war, and in the prisoners of war , as well as in the past four years, that these evidences and proofs actually existed and to the truth was clearly stated. this is that what happened in 2020 in the second garbagh war was not actually an azeri-armenian fight over the disputed area of ​​garbagh, but a bigger plan. a bigger one was actually being implemented behind the scenes, and by the way, this bigger plan was related to the rest of the current developments in the surrounding areas of iran and still is. which is a pardon, in fact, this issue is the war of corridors and the war of corridors , which is basically the goal of the second war of the fro

to nato, what condition nato will be in, whether nato will be able protect us under trump? yes, and then we may have to build new defense alliances, it will be a completely different strategy, completely different options, but simply, i am talking about this because it, well, let's say this, can fundamentally change the situation with nato, but i will also pay attention. on the fact that judging by the context, well, for example, from what zelensky said in an interview with farid zakaria, that there are four basic points and one point for after the war. well, in my opinion, the point about after the war is precisely about nato. now obviously, while the current full-scale war with russia, there will not even be an invitation of ukraine to nato, because it means the risk of a direct war between nato and russia. they don't want that in washington. i think that in moscow as well, but what is the problem, in moscow they understand that they do not want this in washington and are scared by this, they are scared even not only there by the prospect of membership in nato and the app

he sought to weaken nato, but nato is bigger, stronger and ... more united than ever before, with two new members, finland and sweden, but we cannot give up. we all now face another choice: will we continue our support to help ukraine win this war and keep its freedom, or will we withdraw, let us resume aggression and destroy the nation? i know my answer, we cannot tire, we cannot turn away and we will not stop. our support for ukraine until ukraine achieves a just and lasting peace. but, biden's term in the white house is coming to an end, and it's still a month after the election. he will already be called a lame duck, like the president who will soon leave his office. and considering this key factor american elections. as reported, president zelenskyy wants to present his victory plan to both biden and both presidential candidates. judging by the rhetoric of vice president garis, if she wins the election, she may continue biden's policy regarding ukraine, but what can we expect from trump? he repeatedly said that he could stop the war in one day on... he called zelensky a talented

, it is obvious that you should choose nato, i say, not the territory, because if we are in nato, we will deal with the territories sooner or later, but if we return the territories without nato, then these territories will sooner or later. the russian federation will again try to invade, so if you were sitting with us for a beer, mr. bohdan, would you support me or my counterparts who would say that the territory, the territory is more important than nato? well, mr. mykola, beer is with you, this, you know, this, this is the best, that is, it’s hard not to support here, it’s not about beer, tea, okay, tea, i understand, i also about the tea, but i'm talking about the fact that so far... which again, we want, but we don't feel those impulses of a reverse nature that really gave us a concrete road map of how we can become full members, this it is necessary to take into account, secondly, i am quite sure, and i think, our reasoning should be within the nato member states, in particular, ukraine with nato in the future or in nato, this is a greater predictability for european security.

, what condition nato will be in, whether nato will be able to protect us under trump, yes, and thenmay have to build new defense alliances, it will be a completely different strategy, completely different options, that's just me i'm talking about this because, well, let's say this, it can radically change the situation with nato, but i will also pay attention to the fact that judging by... the context, well, for example, from what zelensky said in an interview with farid zakaria, that there are four basic points and one point for after the war. well, in my opinion, the post-war point is precisely about nato. now it is obvious that while the current full-scale war with russia is going on, ukraine will not even be invited to nato, because it means the risk of direct war between nato and russia. they don't want it in washington, i think they don't want it in moscow either also, but what's the problem, in moscow they understand that they don't want this in washington and they scare with this, they scare even not only there with the prospects of membership in nato and the application of

, that this is nato's approval. we no longer see ukraine as the culprit, and all of this, if they are doing this, nato was the one that gave the order. we consider nato to now be responsible and directly engaged in the war and suddenly the us and the okay decide they're gonna take step back on all of this. so even of red lines are being drawn summer saying 14 is bluffing. putting is in a way, saying, try me, you know, try me. you really want to go that far. i mean, come to your senses. well, i think put on the response was very measured, but at the same time there is a very heated discussion here in most go about somehow the kremlin needs to drive the message home to western powers that they're supplying. or if you're praying with long range striking capability, will have certain limits and consequences if the russia words to strike the young to create that. and i'm sure you wouldn't want that to happen. but let's imagine these hypothetical with russia. we're just trying beyond your crane. um, what do you think that

well and not in nato, or without nato. we have only invested into i own defense and to terrance in order to stay safe as what else. but be that as it may, i mean you are, are, you are faced with these current conditions. you and your little lithuanian neighbors meantime, or a warning in particular, the increasing hybrid attacks and recent months we're talking cyber attacks, forced migration acts of sabotage. a few months ago, moscow laid out a plan to unilaterally withdraw its maritime borders and the baltic sea with both you and let the widia it quickly retracted that, but it's being seen as an attempt to so fear how much of a danger just briefly, due to hybrid attacks pose from russia for finland. i think the hybrid attacks and it's rich from those a very, very relevant and unfortunately we're not only talking about the rent and bucks, but also the really incidents of such attacks. but that's the literally statement. i mean, we observe these attacks, not everywhere in europe, and if you really look at that into, into, or

so nato has rejected this proposal. it is said, it risk the alliance becoming part of the conflict which showed nato. do. this is something we are carefully now investigating. and nature will of course and comment when, when the time comes, but so far, this is indeed the case. but at the same time, each nation is also responsible for protecting its, its own h. s. based on and, and the security of, of, i don't see defense. so in this regard we really need to take this situation very, very seriously. but it goes back to, you know, the joint approach and, and, you know, how much on site and how united nato nato allies are in any potential response. um and, you know, nato allies have said previously, we have to do whatever we can to help you. crane and whatever we can to avoid escalation and, you know, the question is, is that still a realistic approach given the current set of conditions on the ground, that certainly is still land remains the, the approach that a also a finland is, is supporting. but of course, what this d

according to russia, russia is directly at war with nato. we can also ask whether these weapons can have any effect on have a battle scene or not? some say that these statements can definitely increase the casualties of the russian army , but. there is absolutely no possibility that the use of such weapons from the very beginning will be equal to the attacks of russia against ukraine by other british or atcom bases. americans with a small number are available to ukraine and in terms of amount. and the quantity is also limited, that's why it is impossible to imagine that the damage that russia can do to russia with its own missile power , the ukrainians can do such a thing, mr. bode britt , in another development, we are faced with two double standards at the same time. we have seen the first one about iran, recently america, england, france. germany and the netherlands claimed that iran gave russia 200 short-range missiles, even claiming that the reason for this was that russia's stockpiles were running out. these 200 missiles are vital for

iran's national risk is a mixed issue, the same issue is actually nato, and that nato finds the possibility to have a wider presence in the northwest borders of iran, and well, this is nato's big plan to be able to, i said, the three countries of iran. to restrain russia and china at the same time and this plan can help nato a lot in this regard. the second point of this line is panturanism, whose ideas are actually not new ideas, but it seems that the ideologues or in any case, the designers of those years recorded and are patiently carrying out a very big project, which, well, this will certainly not go anywhere, considering iran's stance and red lines , but anyway, it is an issue that can be resolved. it affects our national security and our internal security. the third point is the issue of the presence of the siminist regime. see in the fourth last year well, the neighboring areas of iran and the republic of azerbaijan have actually become the mediators of the hand-to-hand war , becoming areas where the siphonist regime has a direct presence, and basically, the intervention of the simi

, that this is nato's approval. we no longer see ukraine as the culprit, and all of this, if they are doing this, nato was the one that gave the order. we consider nato to now be responsible and directly engaged in the war. and suddenly the us and the u. k. decide they're gonna take step back on all of this. so even though the red lines are being drawn summer saying, 14 is bluffing. putting is in a way saying, try me, you know, try me. you really want to go that far. i mean, come to your senses. well, i think put those response was very measured, but at the same time there is a very heated discussion here in most go about somehow the kremlin needs to drive the message home to west and power is that there's supplying or if you're praying with long rain striking capability will have certain limits and consequences if the russia words to strike the young to create that. and i'm sure you wouldn't want that to happen. but let's imagine these hypothetical with russia. we're just try and beyond the ukraine. um, why do you

this weekend, russian drones fell in two nato countries, latvia and romania. and this is not the first time. today we will try to figure out whether such incidents are accidental or deliberate provocations on the part of moscow. but about everything in order. so, on saturday, september 7 , a russian military drone crashed in the east of latvia. the local publication deelfi, citing the country's ministry of defense, writes that a russian drone flew into the airspace from belarus. the investigation is still underway, but according to preliminary information from experts, the drone did not have a specific purpose to fly to latvia. such cases. on the eastern flank of nato, they are becoming more and more frequent - said latvian president edgars rinkevičs. we are in close contact with our allies. the number of such incidents is increasing flanks of nato, and we must solve them together. and romania's airspace was violated by two russian drones at once, and f-16 fighter jets were even raised to intercept them, as the romanian ministry of defense said. according to t

but you've previously said that it's an issue that you're taking up with your fellow nato's nato alliance ministers. a foreign minister was, excuse me, what are other leaders and for him is just telling you when you take this up with them as well, i'm not commenting on behalf of the message is clear. and i have also taken this off a bilaterally with, with my colleagues, and i just hope that that, that we will be able to help you crane in the best possible way. put this into the big picture for us because you've said that you shouldn't rule anything out and long term, as we've heard, including sending troops is in the risk that at some point, it will be too late. yes, well we of course said i'm scrutinizing the situation um on a daily basis to get uh with, with the allies and partners. but again, this is not the situation when it would be about sending troops to ukraine. this is not something from interest is considering at the moment, or of causing the long term. it's important that we don't rule everything out. on the contrary it's, it's very important that we speak to a narrative which

nato allies are in any potential response. um and, you know, nato allies have said previously, we have to do whatever we can to help you. crane and whatever we can to avoid escalation and, you know, the question is, is that still a realistic approach given the current set of conditions on the ground, that certainly is still the land remains the, the approach that a also a finland is, is supporting. but of course, what this debatable and is debatable every day. also, as the conflict evolves, is that what should be counted as a step towards escalation? because a said it is not to do a crane and not us. the other countries who have been helping ukraine in, in these 2 and a half years, to not being responsible for the escalation, it's been russia. i'd like to ask you um, briefly about the sense of resolve about supporting ukraine among your nato allies . you are a member of the us, we mentioned you're a very strong supporter of ukraine. we have seen some cracks emerge in the united states and uh, you know, uh, presidential candida

of nato's torani corridor. more about russia's position regarding this corridor, as well as the plan you mentioned we are talking to him, mr. bahman , they also call zang zor claim corridor with the title or another name as torani nato corridor. mr. dr. kazemi , let's talk more about the role of nato. what is the role of the western countries in bringing up this corridor ? what are the most important goals they are pursuing now in bringing up and relaunching this issue? well, mr. doctor, it is actually to clearly explain the context of the issue here, based on the evidence that actually existed before the second qorbagh war, and in the prisoners of war, as well as in these four. last year in in fact, these evidences exist and were clearly mentioned. the truth is that what happened in 2020 in the second war of garbagh was not actually an azeri-armenian fight over the disputed region of garbagh, but a bigger plan was actually being implemented behind the scenes , which happened to be this bigger plan. and the big

"this is matter, these weapons can only be used by american and nato personnel, this means that nato and the united states are, whichever country, britain, the united states are in direct conflict in this in this direct participants in this war, they're not allowing ukraine to use them, they're using them themselves, they cannot be used by ukrainian, requires american or british officers to fire these weapons, so the russians know that, the germans." that about the taurus missiles a leak telephone call, so this is an extremely dangerous escalation and has said quite clearly in this case, the russians have said, if you do this, you direct participants in that war, so that means a state of war would exist between the nato and the united states or britain and and russia, it's extremely dangerous, of course the state of war doesn't necessarily mean armed conflict immediately, there's a state of war in korea for 70 years, but it means that the russians are going to respond in some way, somebody along, somebody around the world, the ansara or iran are going to get some nice weapons from ru

nato chiefs of general staff are gathering in prague. is there already a decision on the possible strikes with western weapons deep into russian territory? we will discuss this and other issues live with the russian ambassador to belgium. didn't get there. destination in the usa the train crashed into a tractor with military equipment at full speed, the moment of the collision was filmed by eyewitnesses. servicemen of the northern fleet practiced defense against enemy sabotage groups. this is part of the okean-2024 exercises. according to the scenario , a sabotage and reconnaissance group attacked a naval aviation airfield. the attack was repelled. a mi-8 helicopter with an operational fire group on board took part in the exercises . it searched for and blocked saboteurs. the airfield was covered by the crews of su-30 sm and su-33 aircraft. in the southern donetsk direction, special operations units of the vostok force group are destroying fortified positions in the ukrainian armed forces. tulip self-propelled mortars are practicing agai

yes, ukraine has not joined nato, but nato with its missiles has already entered ukraine. and if so, then there is no need to ask kiev about anything, what to ask it, and what depends on it, therefore the issue is not about allowing the ukrainian regime to strike russia with these weapons or not, the issue is about making a decision about whether nato countries directly participate in the military conflict or not, if this decision will be made, it will mean that... the history of international relations, including napoleon, hitler, yes, but with napoleon and hitler it was necessary to fight head-on, and how, certainly without any restrictions, with all forces. now, in the case of missile strikes deep into russia, the prospect of a head-on clash with the us and nato, once again, if anyone has not heard, it will be... political scientist and perhaps even a duo of russian political scientists, very authoritative, sergei karaganov. the first strikes, of course, should not be nuclear, but it will be necessary obviously strike targets in nato countries that play an important role in supply

ukraine's invitation to nato is part of the victory plan. mr.does not receive an invitation from the north atlantic alliance, which is one of the... points of our victory and victory plan, does this mean that this victory plan may not be implemented? oh, you know, you know , as an analyst, mr. serhii, you found this question to be the key one, because we are so convinced that there will be an invitation . i generally have my own vision of prospects in nato. er operatives, i am not too optimistic here, to be honest, well, unfortunately, yes, i am more of a realist, but really this will be such a contradiction, yes, we expect that by the end of the year we will already be invited, and conditionally saying, they will take us under an umbrella, but for some reason it seems to me that they do not really expect us there and do not really want to take us under an umbrella, because they understand it. well , nato leaders, what are the risks for them, electoral risks, sorry, we understand how electoral the electoral process is today in the states, in the

not sure why nato figures that russia is obligated to react to nato provocation on nato schedule or on their terms. but the 2. ringback is definitely changing and count german chancellor, all of schultz is now talking about the need for peace and for russia to be at the negotiating table and saying that when it comes to sending, you're authorizing german long range weapons against russia. he's out. i'm sticking to my stance, even if other countries decide differently. i won't do that because i think it's a problem. and just don't want 3 months. schultz has gone from hyper ventilating about russia's imperial ambitions. just suggesting that protein needs to be at the table for talks to secure europe's peace order. that's quite a shift. it's not like the battlefield situation has really changed much over that entire time that they've been having these wild swings. it sounds like these guys have more of a clinical situation on our hands rather than the military. 11, the navy requires a few straight jackets to be added to the next nato catalog jacket supply order. well, wrapping up the prog

and all nato members must respond to such a threat collectively.n was a series of terrorist attacks in the united states, when al-qaeda militants hijacked several passenger planes and directed them to the twin towers, the world trade center in new york, and the pentagon in washington. the nato council in brussels held emergency meeting, expressing support for the united states, their plan for a large operation to eradicate terrorism in afghanistan. in addition to nato, it is important to note now. russia came to the aid of the united states then. it was our country that shared intelligence with the americans, which helped in the fight against the taliban. russia provided the opportunity for convenient transit delivery of military cargo to afghanistan, allowing this to be done through its territory by land, by air. and by agreeing with other neighboring countries. this agreement was in effect until 2015, when the united states and nato officially ended the active part of the operation in afghanistan. this is what this day in history was like. the wa

nato collective defense, make nato stronger. the world has become much more dangerous over ten years. but nato is much stronger, more defense spending, a higher readiness and for the first time in our history combat troops in eastern border lines. these are big achieve what would you say are the biggest disappointments , failures catastrophes, the full-scale invasion of ukraine it started in 2014 with annexation of crimea, but on the full-scale invasion in 2022 and then of course what happened the withdrawal from afghanistan that was and remains painful well, i was expecting you to say that. tell me why i've gone as don down, don't was paint that is, and walz painful because we tried something that we didn't achieve. we try to build the democratic free of august on, with equal rights for men and women, will start focused counterterrorism operation. moved into a big ambitious, nation-building mission and that mission creep was too much because reality was that we didn't have the resources. they will and to do that for decades. >>

ukraine's invitation to nato is part of the victory plan. mr. ukraine does not receive an invitation from the north atlantic alliance, and this is one of the points of our victory and victory plan, does this mean that this victory plan may not be implemented? oh, you are asking such a question immediately, you know, well, you found, as an analyst, mr. serhiy, in my opinion, this is the key, yes, such a question, because we are... convinced that there will be an invitation, i personally, excuse me, well, for some reason i am not very convinced, in me my overall vision of prospects in nato, operational ones, i am not too optimistic here, to be honest, on, well, unfortunately, yes, i am more of a realist, but really, this will be such a contradiction, yes, we expect that by the end of the year we will already be invited and, relatively speaking, they will take us under... a sosolka, but for some reason it seems to me that we are not really there expect and do not really want to take under the umbrella, because the countries, well, the leaders of na

who are fighting nato, it is nato that is fighting us, and lavrov said correctly that the decision to long-range missiles deep into russia has already been made, now they are simply wrapping it in candy to somehow present it, what are we afraid of, we are afraid, maybe, that some of our positions are like that, our allies. the global south will not understand us, yes, it will understand, it will understand, when you have a strong ally who knows how to stand up for himself, it means he will help you if necessary, if you are in danger, so the second thing is that today 34 countries have applied to brics , and real processes of forming an alternative to the same un have really begun, we may not see this yet, but it really... nativa, this just says that the global south will understand us, will understand, if we respond very harshly to this escalation, it is there that they can shout that putin is escalating, in fact, we see what is happening, step by step they are trying to put on their knees, because you understand, not everyone understands why you say, the imf is coming here, why do we

, we understand that, well, plus it usually happens at nato summits, but at the same time, i am suren wants to go down in history as a person who is a winner in a certain sense , at least from the point of view of helping ukraine, that's why i and... i'm sure, all ukrainians count on the fact that he will support the victory plan proposed by president zelensky. president zelenskyi also spoke about the deadlines, he said that the plan is designed for decisions that should take place starting from october by the month of december, then we believe that the plan will work, this is a quote from the president: what if the us does not agree to support this plan, isn't that an ambitious time frame? i am... the fact is that, as the president himself said, the next months can be decisive, that is, we understand and see it, that is, it depends on these months in which direction events will develop, for example, on the battlefield, and the united the states are interested, they have already invested, well, about 200 billion dollars in supporting ukraine, that is, they are interested in to mainta

nato's position is somewhat hypocritical: nato says: you can become a member of nato as soon as you win war, you don't need it anymore. i think that some of our western european friends are using the idea of ​​ukraine joining nato. as a bargaining chip with russia. now the west is thinking about whether to give ukraine the go-ahead to use long-range missiles deep into russia, the us is reported to be able to do so in the coming weeks, although there is currently a split in the us ruling circles.

the united states is the cornerstone of nato. without america, nato would be only nominally capable and defensible. the united states spent $968 billion on defense last year, more than all other nato allies combined. finally, i meet an elite unit, the 82nd airborne division paratroopers from north carolina, who are known for their ability to drop behind enemy lines anywhere in the world within hours of an alert to secure an area. russia's aggressive war against ukraine, in particular, once again and daily shows how important artillery is on the modern battlefield. the ptskh-2000 self-propelled howitzer and the mlrs multiple launch rocket system were among the first arms deliveries from germany to ukraine. at the last ramstein meeting, i announced the delivery of another twelve self-propelled howitzers-2000 to ukraine, six of which, i believe, will be. despite the fact that the shooting is blank, and the fatal injuries are staged, the territorial defense forces are struggling to repel the attack of the enemy sabotage and reconnais

according to russia, russia is directly at war with nato. we can also ask whether these weapons can have any effect on the scene. they are also limited in terms of quantity. therefore, it is impossible to imagine that the ukrainians can do the damage that russia can do to russia with its missile power. mr. in another development, we faced two double standards at the same time. we see the first one about iran. recently america, england, france, germany, holland claim that iran gave russia 200 short-range missiles. even claiming that the reason for this issue is that russia's reserves are running out and these 200 missiles are vital for russia. of course, iran has officially rejected these claims and announced that western countries should act like iran itself. support the peace negotiations and the end of the war. however, the west itself has provided more than 400 billion dollars in military aid to kiev. with this 400 billion dollars of military aid to one of the war parties, are the american officials and nato member countries in a position

this is what nato wants to do. and essentially, you will have nato, a back troops in russia proper today in the course guerria. but there's no denying the nato is at war with russia. been that is the double speak that we keep getting from western and it leads to this day, is that no, no, no, no, we're not part of the conflict. well george, the rubicon has been crossed. go ahead, but you're absolutely right for you to and it is quite extraordinary that the nato ventures, particularly in the united kingdom, but in many parts of europe. uh, i'll just going whoa and thinking yeah, we can take the take this additional step. uh, because uh, built in his block thing area, you know, everything in a book, we don't have to worry about anything. but putin has to say. and it is very, very strange because um, earlier uh, in the week uh, booked, it had issued a very explicit stage. and now they, they, you know, they have been russian leaders, a car and the lady who been through just through the mouth solve and make all sorts of,

however, the americans and nato forces did not stop. on october 3rd, 2015, they killed 42 civilians in attack a hospital operated by doctors without borders in condues. incident like this was repeated on march 4, 2007. on that day, united states marines fired on people and killed 19 civilians in chenwar. they thought that they identified a would be suicide bomber among citizens. the report says the marines frantically flet the scene, destroyed a six-mile stretch of highway, started firing weapons and shot almost everyone around. in the same year, polish forces accompanied by the us soldiers attacked a wedding ceremony in a village and killed 40 women and... there was a pregnant woman among the victims. two years later in 2009, the us forces killed 15 afghan students on the school bus. on may 5 of the same year, us military offensive killed 140 civilians in abdul basir khan village in farah province. the news about the us crimes was totally censored by the mainstream media, but in july 2010, wikileaks, which had classified information, p

if your president is right to nato is becoming and decisive and fearful, the nato is no longer fit for purpose. is it when i have to aggravate miss my president in this code and perfect you know some many. if you're looking to east on it, there are some 7 or other that's a new federal dimes. what that i show has sometimes successfully installed in the head of the best and most of the 1st as the and 1st battle dying. but that i shall see all trying to communicate is that the conflict should happen only on the 1030 of the victim and the address on what the what agent should be remain on punched. this is 1st i'm in the military history. and the 2nd idea of what that i show is that trying to and it to communicate over, click over play. and to us, is that the right? it is impossible for russia to rules. again, it's not the correct the right size, last 7 of or so the throughout the they use the result. nobody have up as of may. so not persuaded them that all the other members are showing in his woods in decision and fear of a rush on. so i'll try and do the install this free or so it is, of